Jaskiewicz Filip, Bieliński Jakub R, Jedrzejczak Adam, Huntley Riley
Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 23;25(12):451. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512451. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Bystander-administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial for the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, only roughly 58% of bystanders would provide CPR, with wide variations across different regions. Identifying each factor affecting the barrier or readiness to perform resuscitation is a significant challenge for researchers. This study aimed to evaluate the obstacles preventing first-year medical students from initiating CPR, focusing on the size of domestic residential environments and the time and methodology of practical training.
The original online questionnaire surveyed first-year medical students at the Medical University of Łódź from February 1 to March 2, 2024. The questionnaire development involved a literature review, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. Participation was voluntary and anonymous, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using PQStat software, employing descriptive statistics.
The study revealed that 271 medical students reported a similar median of barriers regardless of the place of residence (median (Me) = 5, interquartile range (IQR) 2-6.25 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6 vs. Me = 4, IQR 3-6, = 0.620). Out of 18 analyzed barriers, the only significant difference was found for crowded places. Medical students living in cities most frequently reported a willingness to perform CPR with rescue breaths for all victims. Those who grew up in towns <100,000 residents were less willing to start CPR if an unknown adult were the victim (rural area: 39.2% vs. town: 17.6% vs. city: 45.1%, < 0.01). The number of reported barriers was similar regardless of training type and the time since training; however, the nature of these barriers varied after a year passed.
Respondents across various locations reported similar number and types of barriers to performing CPR, including the most commonly declared fear of harm, uncertainty about recognizing cardiac arrest, and concerns about disease transmission. Although differences connected to the type of victims were observed, its low or moderate practical significance needs more comprehensive research on the impact of the size of the place of residence on the willingness to perform resuscitation and the related barriers.
旁观者实施心肺复苏术(CPR)对于院外心脏骤停患者的存活至关重要。然而,只有约58%的旁观者会实施心肺复苏术,不同地区差异很大。识别影响实施复苏的障碍或意愿的每个因素对研究人员来说是一项重大挑战。本研究旨在评估阻碍一年级医学生开始实施心肺复苏术的因素,重点关注家庭居住环境的大小以及实践培训的时间和方法。
原始在线问卷于2024年2月1日至3月2日对罗兹医科大学的一年级医学生进行了调查。问卷的制定涉及文献综述、专家评估和预测试。参与是自愿且匿名的,有严格的纳入和排除标准。使用PQStat软件对数据进行分析,采用描述性统计。
研究表明,271名医学生报告的障碍中位数相似,无论居住地点如何(中位数(Me)=5,四分位间距(IQR)2 - 6.25,对比Me = 4,IQR 3 - 6,对比Me = 4,IQR 3 - 6,P = 0.620)。在分析的18个障碍中,仅在拥挤场所发现了显著差异。居住在城市的医学生最常报告愿意对所有受害者进行带人工呼吸的心肺复苏术。如果受害者是不认识的成年人,那些在居民人数<10万的城镇长大的人不太愿意开始实施心肺复苏术(农村地区:39.2%,对比城镇:17.6%,对比城市:)。无论培训类型和培训后的时间如何,报告的障碍数量相似;然而,一年后这些障碍的性质有所不同。
不同地点的受访者报告的实施心肺复苏术的障碍数量和类型相似,包括最常提到的害怕伤害、识别心脏骤停的不确定性以及对疾病传播的担忧。尽管观察到与受害者类型有关的差异,但其低或中等的实际意义需要对居住地点大小对实施复苏意愿及相关障碍的影响进行更全面的研究。