Anwar Imran J, DeLaura Isabel, Ladowski Joseph M, Schilirò Davide, Gao Qimeng, Manook Miriam, Yoon Janghoon, Belloni Rafaela, Park Angela, Schuster Daniel J, Song Mingqing, Lin Lin, Farris Alton B, Magnani Diogo, Williams Kyha, Kwun Jean, Knechtle Stuart J
Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sci Transl Med. 2025 Jan;17(779):eadn8130. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adn8130. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
Current desensitization and maintenance immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation in sensitized individuals show limited ability to control the posttransplant humoral response, resulting in high rates of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure. Here, we showed that anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based immunosuppression more effectively controlled allograft rejection and humoral rebound in a highly sensitized nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model compared with tacrolimus-based standard-of-care (SOC) immunosuppression. Desensitization with an anti-CD154 mAb (5C8) and a proteasome inhibitor led to decreased donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and disruption of lymph node germinal centers with reduction of proliferating, memory, and class-switched B cells as well as T follicular helper cells. After transplant, the nonhuman primates maintained on 5C8-based immunosuppression had significantly better survival compared with those maintained on SOC immunosuppression (135.2 days versus 32.8 days, = 0.013). The 5C8-treated group demonstrated better suppression of DSAs after transplant, more robust suppression of B cell populations, and better induction of regulatory T cells. Fewer infectious and welfare complications, including viral reactivation and weight loss, were also observed with 5C8-based immunosuppression compared with SOC immunosuppression. Therefore, anti-CD154 mAbs may improve kidney transplant outcomes through better control of posttransplant immune responses. The superior efficacy of anti-CD154 mAb-based immunosuppression over tacrolimus-based SOC seen in this highly sensitized NHP transplant model suggests that anti-CD154 mAbs could potentially be used to desensitize and treat highly sensitized patients receiving kidney transplantation.
目前用于致敏个体肾移植的脱敏和维持免疫抑制方案在控制移植后体液反应方面能力有限,导致抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)和移植物失败率很高。在此,我们表明,与基于他克莫司的标准治疗(SOC)免疫抑制相比,基于抗CD154单克隆抗体(mAb)的免疫抑制在高度致敏的非人灵长类动物肾移植模型中能更有效地控制同种异体移植物排斥反应和体液反弹。用抗CD154 mAb(5C8)和蛋白酶体抑制剂进行脱敏治疗可导致供体特异性抗体(DSA)减少,并破坏淋巴结生发中心,减少增殖性、记忆性和类别转换B细胞以及T滤泡辅助细胞。移植后,接受基于5C8免疫抑制的非人灵长类动物的存活率明显高于接受SOC免疫抑制的动物(135.2天对32.8天,P = 0.013)。5C8治疗组在移植后对DSA的抑制效果更好,对B细胞群体的抑制更强,对调节性T细胞的诱导也更好。与SOC免疫抑制相比,基于5C8的免疫抑制还观察到更少的感染和福利并发症,包括病毒再激活和体重减轻。因此,抗CD154 mAb可能通过更好地控制移植后免疫反应来改善肾移植结果。在这个高度致敏的非人灵长类动物移植模型中,基于抗CD154 mAb的免疫抑制比基于他克莫司的SOC具有更高的疗效,这表明抗CD154 mAb可能潜在地用于对接受肾移植的高度致敏患者进行脱敏和治疗。