Gupta Mehul, Wells Connor, Regan Meredith M, Xie Wanling, Navani Vishal, Saliby Renee Maria, Basappa Naveen S, Donskov Frede, Yuasa Takeshi, Takemura Kosuke, Kollmannsberger Christian K, Crumbaker Megan, Lalani Aly-Khan A, Powles Thomas, Ebrahimi Hedyeh, McKay Rana R, Lee Jae-Lyun, Kanesvaran Ravindran, Choueiri Toni K, Heng Daniel Y C
Tom Baker Cancer Centre University of Calgary Calgary Canada.
BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Canada.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Feb;8(1):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
Patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy may experience periods of prolonged disease control without a need for systemic therapy. Treatment-free survival (TFS) is an important measure for this period, but no data are available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) starting first-line agents. Our aim was to analyze TFS outcomes for patients with mRCC starting first-line therapy.
We analyzed data for patients with mRCC starting first-line systemic therapy with VEGFR-targeted monotherapy, an ICB + VEGFR combination, or an ICB doublet from February 1, 2014 to February 1, 2023 from the multicenter International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) database. We estimated 36-mo TFS as the difference in restricted mean survival time between (1) the time to first-line therapy discontinuation and (2) the time to subsequent systemic therapy initiation.
The study population included 3758 patients receiving either first-line VEGFR monotherapy (n = 2635), an ICB + VEGFR combination (n = 354), or doublet ICB (n = 769) were included. For the IMDC favorable-risk cohort, the 36-mo TFS estimate was 3.1 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-4.6) for the VEGFR monotherapy group and 3.7 mo (95% CI 0.2-7.2) for the ICB + VEGFR group. For the IMDC intermediate-/poor-risk cohort, TFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI 1.4-2.8) for the VEGFR monotherapy group, 3.7 mo (95% CI 1.0-6.4) for the ICB + VEGFR group, and 5.3 mo (95% CI 3.8-6.8) for ICB doublet group. Limitations include the retrospective design and an inability to quantify time spent with adverse events.
Our study demonstrates that patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk treated with ICB doublet therapy experienced longer TFS than those treated with VEGFR monotherapy in the first-line setting. These results emphasize the utility of TFS as an informative endpoint and provide survival estimates to inform decision-making in mRCC.
For patients with metastatic kidney cancer, we compared the survival time free from a second treatment line for different first-line treatment options. The results show that the time free from second-line treatment was longer when first-line treatment was with a combination of two immunotherapy drugs (ipilimumab and nivolumab) in comparison to other treatment options.
接受免疫检查点阻断(ICB)治疗的患者可能会经历无需全身治疗的疾病长期控制期。无治疗生存期(TFS)是衡量这一时期的重要指标,但对于开始一线治疗的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者尚无相关数据。我们的目的是分析开始一线治疗的mRCC患者的TFS结果。
我们分析了2014年2月1日至2023年2月1日期间,来自多中心国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)数据库中开始一线全身治疗的mRCC患者的数据,这些患者接受了VEGFR靶向单药治疗、ICB + VEGFR联合治疗或ICB双联治疗。我们将36个月的TFS估计为(1)一线治疗停药时间与(2)后续全身治疗开始时间之间受限平均生存时间的差异。
研究人群包括3758例接受一线VEGFR单药治疗(n = 2635)、ICB + VEGFR联合治疗(n = 354)或ICB双联治疗(n = 769)的患者。对于IMDC有利风险队列,VEGFR单药治疗组的36个月TFS估计为3.1个月(95%置信区间[CI] 1.5 - 4.6),ICB + VEGFR组为3.7个月(95% CI 0.2 - 7.2)。对于IMDC中/低风险队列,VEGFR单药治疗组的TFS为个月(95% CI 1.4 - 2.8),ICB + VEGFR组为3.7个月(95% CI 1.0 - 6.4),ICB双联治疗组为5.3个月(95% CI 3.8 - 6.8)。局限性包括回顾性设计以及无法量化不良事件持续时间。
我们的研究表明,在一线治疗中,接受ICB双联治疗的IMDC中/低风险患者的TFS长于接受VEGFR单药治疗者。这些结果强调了TFS作为一个有价值终点的实用性,并为mRCC的决策提供生存估计。
对于转移性肾癌患者,我们比较了不同一线治疗方案下无二线治疗的生存时间。结果显示,与其他治疗方案相比,一线使用两种免疫治疗药物(伊匹木单抗和纳武单抗)联合治疗时,无二线治疗的时间更长。