Suppr超能文献

正畸治疗后根管治疗牙和活髓牙的根尖外吸收:一项回顾性研究

External Apical Root Resorption in Endodontically Treated and Vital Teeth after Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Karimzada Elchin, Esenlik Elçin, Er Kürşat

机构信息

Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Antalya, Turkey.

Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2024 Dec 31;37(4):249-256. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2024.25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to assess the presence and amount of external apical root resorption (EARR) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and contralateral teeth with vital pulp (VPT) following orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

The study sample included panoramic radiographs of 503 patients (314 females and 189 males; 16.29 years±3.98) with 620 ETT and 580 VPT. The tooth length was measured on digital panoramic radiographs, which were collected at the beginning and end of the orthodontic therapy for each subject. The pre- and post-orthodontic treatment radiographic evaluation included the percentage of EARR in ETT and contralateral VPT for all tooth types. Any relationship between EARR and orthodontic treatment type (one- and two-phase; extraction and non-extraction), duration, and patients' age and gender were investigated. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman correlation tests were applied for comparisons and to test the correlations.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was observed in all orthodontic treatment groups when ETT and VPT were compared in terms of EARR (p<0.05). EARR was positively correlated with orthodontic treatment duration and type (p<0.05) but was not influenced by patient age or gender. Statistically significant EARR was observed in the two-phase extraction orthodontic treatment group for both ETT and VPT. In VPT, a statistically significant EARR was found in the one-phase extraction treatment group compared with the non-extraction treatment group, whereas no significant difference was found in ETT.

CONCLUSION

ETT showed significantly lower EARR than VPT. ETT can therefore be moved safely during orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估正畸治疗后根管治疗牙(ETT)和对侧牙髓活力正常牙(VPT)根尖外吸收(EARR)的存在情况及吸收量。

方法

研究样本包括503例患者(314例女性和189例男性;平均年龄16.29岁±3.98岁)的全景X线片,其中有620颗ETT和580颗VPT。在数字化全景X线片上测量牙齿长度,这些X线片是在每位受试者正畸治疗开始和结束时收集的。正畸治疗前后的影像学评估包括所有牙型ETT和对侧VPT中EARR的百分比。研究了EARR与正畸治疗类型(一阶段和两阶段;拔牙和不拔牙)、持续时间以及患者年龄和性别的关系。采用Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman相关性检验进行比较和检验相关性。

结果

在所有正畸治疗组中,比较ETT和VPT的EARR时均观察到统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。EARR与正畸治疗持续时间和类型呈正相关(p<0.05),但不受患者年龄或性别的影响。在两阶段拔牙正畸治疗组中,ETT和VPT均观察到统计学显著的EARR。在VPT中,与非拔牙治疗组相比,一阶段拔牙治疗组发现有统计学显著的EARR,而在ETT中未发现显著差异。

结论

ETT的EARR明显低于VPT。因此,正畸治疗期间可以安全移动ETT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e90/11705196/cf457341a021/TurkJOrthod-37-249-figure-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验