Pavone Natalia, Cammertoni Federico, Calabrese Maria, Bruno Piergiorgio, Scoppettuolo Giancarlo, Lombardo Antonella, Giovannenze Francesca, Taddei Eleonora, Fiori Barbara, D'Inzeo Tiziana, Cutrone Gessica, Iannaccone Giulia, Del Zanna Niccolò, Massetti Massimo
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;11:1504197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1504197. eCollection 2024.
Aetiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are essential to improve the prognosis of patients with infective endocarditis. Molecular tests on blood have been reported to be effective in identifying the causative organism and are recommended when blood cultures are negative. The role of molecular tests on the surgically excised valve is still unclear and needs further investigation.
In this prospective, observational, single center study, we enrolled 100 consecutive patients with native or prosthetic valve endocarditis who underwent cardiac surgery between April 2020 and June 2023. Results of preoperative blood cultures, valve culture, 16s ribosomal RNA and histopathologic analysis of surgical samples were collected in a dedicated database.
The mean age of the study population was 60 ± 12.5 years, with a majority of men (73%). Previous cardiac surgery was reported in 31% of patients. Blood culture, valve culture, and 16srRNA were positive in 83%, 47%, and 76% of cases, respectively. The sensitivity of both valve culture and 16srRNA decreased significantly with prolonged preoperative antibiotic therapy. Of note, 16srRNA was the only positive result in 7% of cases, allowing aetiological diagnosis. In 33% of patients, the valve culture test was negative while the molecular test was positive. In these cases, histopathological analysis showed acute inflammation in most cases. In 10%, the molecular test helped in resolving discrepancies between the results of blood and valve cultures.
The molecular test showed significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than valve culture and maintained this efficacy even after 28 days of preoperative antibiotic therapy. In addition to identifying the pathogen in 7% of cases with negative culture results, the molecular test demonstrated utility in other crucial situations. When valve cultures were negative, combining molecular testing and histopathological analysis they allowed the identification of patients who could benefit from prolonged antibiotic therapy. In addition, molecular testing guided the choice of antibiotic treatment when there was a discrepancy between blood culture and valve culture results. Based on these findings, molecular testing should be considered in all patients with infective endocarditis undergoing cardiac surgery. : ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT05791357).
病因诊断和针对性抗生素治疗对于改善感染性心内膜炎患者的预后至关重要。据报道,血液分子检测在识别病原体方面有效,当血培养结果为阴性时推荐使用。手术切除瓣膜的分子检测作用仍不明确,需要进一步研究。
在这项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究中,我们纳入了2020年4月至2023年6月期间连续100例接受心脏手术的天然瓣膜或人工瓣膜心内膜炎患者。术前血培养、瓣膜培养、16s核糖体RNA以及手术样本的组织病理学分析结果被收集到一个专用数据库中。
研究人群的平均年龄为60±12.5岁,大多数为男性(73%)。31%的患者曾接受过心脏手术。血培养、瓣膜培养和16srRNA检测阳性率分别为83%、47%和76%。随着术前抗生素治疗时间延长,瓣膜培养和16srRNA检测的敏感性均显著下降。值得注意的是,16srRNA是7%病例中的唯一阳性结果,从而实现了病因诊断。在33%的患者中,瓣膜培养检测为阴性而分子检测为阳性。在这些病例中,组织病理学分析显示大多数病例存在急性炎症。在10%的病例中,分子检测有助于解决血培养和瓣膜培养结果之间的差异。
分子检测显示出比瓣膜培养显著更高的诊断敏感性,即使在术前抗生素治疗28天后仍保持这种有效性。除了在7%培养结果为阴性的病例中识别病原体外,分子检测在其他关键情况下也显示出作用。当瓣膜培养为阴性时,将分子检测与组织病理学分析相结合可识别出可能从延长抗生素治疗中获益的患者。此外,当血培养和瓣膜培养结果存在差异时,分子检测可指导抗生素治疗的选择。基于这些发现,对于所有接受心脏手术的感染性心内膜炎患者均应考虑进行分子检测。:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符(NCT05791357)