Kerslake Milo, Chui Yingbin, Pham Tan-Phu, Dinh Michael, Kaikhosrovi Mahsa, Bennett Katherine, Oliver Matthew
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14552. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14552.
To compare the frequency of clinically significant missed injuries in clinically stable trauma patients undergoing initial whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) versus selective imaging. Secondary objectives include comparisons of radiation exposure, incidental findings, ED length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and mortality.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of trauma activations at a tertiary trauma centre in patients with normal vital signs from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and chart review of medical records.
A total of 665 patients were included with 42% (n = 277) receiving a WBCT, compared to 58% (n = 388) undergoing selective imaging. Most patients (52%) did not have any traumatic axial injuries identified. Missed injuries were identified in 0.8% (n = 3/388) of patients in the selective imaging cohort, with no adverse patient outcomes or major alteration to inpatient management. No missed injuries were identified in the WBCT group. Mortality was rare (0.9%, n = 6/665), occurring exclusively in elderly patients and mostly attributed to non-traumatic pathologies. Patients undergoing WBCT had a significantly increased likelihood of incidental findings (75% vs 35%, P < 0.001), increased radiation exposure (mean 24.67 vs 8.19 millisieverts [mSv], P < 0.001), longer ED LOS (9.86 vs 8.43 h, P = 0.012) and a higher likelihood of admission (65.3% vs 55.7%, P = 0.012).
Missed injuries were rare and without major complications in this clinically stable cohort. The liberal use of WBCT, despite low rates of missed injuries, morbidity and mortality, suggests over-utilisation of WBCT for 'mechanism only' traumas.
比较接受初始全身计算机断层扫描(WBCT)的临床稳定创伤患者与选择性成像患者中具有临床意义的漏诊损伤的发生率。次要目标包括比较辐射暴露、偶然发现、急诊留观时间(LOS)、住院LOS和死亡率。
我们对2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日在一家三级创伤中心生命体征正常的创伤激活患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据从创伤登记处和病历图表审查中收集。
共纳入665例患者,其中42%(n = 277)接受了WBCT,58%(n = 388)接受了选择性成像。大多数患者(52%)未发现任何创伤性轴向损伤。在选择性成像队列中,0.8%(n = 3/388)的患者发现了漏诊损伤,患者无不良结局,住院管理也无重大改变。WBCT组未发现漏诊损伤。死亡率很低(0.9%,n = 6/665),仅发生在老年患者中,主要归因于非创伤性疾病。接受WBCT的患者偶然发现的可能性显著增加(75%对35%,P < 0.001),辐射暴露增加(平均24.67对8.19毫希沃特[mSv],P < 0.001),急诊LOS更长(9.86对8.43小时,P = 0.012),入院可能性更高(65.3%对55.7%,P = 0.012)。
在这个临床稳定的队列中,漏诊损伤很少见且无重大并发症。尽管漏诊损伤、发病率和死亡率较低,但WBCT的广泛使用表明其在“仅基于机制”的创伤中存在过度使用的情况。