Mansour Alexandra I, Nuliyalu Ushapoorna, Thompson Michael P, Keteyian Steven, Sukul Devraj
Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1305 Dock St, Apt 310, Baltimore, MD 21231. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Dec;30(12):651-657. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89637.
Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiovascular outcomes, adherence remains low. Higher patient-incurred out-of-pocket (OOP) spending may be a barrier to CR adherence. We evaluated the association between OOP spending for the first CR session and adherence.
Retrospective analysis.
Commercial and Medicare supplemental beneficiaries with a CR-qualifying event between 2016 and 2020 who attended at least 1 CR session within 6 months of discharge were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. OOP spending for the first session was categorized as zero or into 1 of 3 increasing tertiles of OOP spending. Poisson regression was used to determine the association between OOP-spending tertile and CR adherence, defined as the number of CR sessions attended within 6 months of discharge.
A total of 43,992 beneficiaries attended at least 1 CR session. Of these, 35,883 (81.6%) paid $0, 2702 (6.1%) paid $0.01 to $25.39, 2704 (6.1%) paid $25.40 to $82.41, and 2703 (6.1%) paid at least $82.42 for the first session, constituting the first, second, and third OOP-spending tertiles, respectively. Compared with the zero-OOP cohort, the first-tertile cohort attended 13.5% (95% CI, 1.4%-27.1%; P = .028) more CR sessions and the second- and third-tertile cohorts attended 11.9% (95% CI, -16.4% to -7.1%; P < .001) and 30.9% (95% CI, -40.8% to -19.4%; P < .001) fewer CR sessions on average, respectively. For every additional $10 spent OOP on the first CR session, patients attended 0.41 fewer sessions on average (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.17; P < .001).
Among patients with OOP spending, higher spending was associated with lower CR adherence, dose dependently. Reducing OOP costs for CR may improve adherence for beneficiaries with cost sharing.
尽管心脏康复(CR)可改善心血管结局,但依从性仍然很低。患者自付费用(OOP)增加可能是心脏康复依从性的一个障碍。我们评估了首次心脏康复治疗的自付费用与依从性之间的关联。
回顾性分析。
在MarketScan商业数据库中识别出2016年至2020年间有符合心脏康复条件事件、出院后6个月内至少参加过1次心脏康复治疗的商业保险和医疗保险补充受益人群。首次治疗的自付费用分为零或自付费用递增的三个三分位数之一。采用泊松回归确定自付费用三分位数与心脏康复依从性之间的关联,心脏康复依从性定义为出院后6个月内参加的心脏康复治疗次数。
共有43992名受益人至少参加过1次心脏康复治疗。其中,35883人(81.6%)支付0美元,2702人(6.1%)支付0.01美元至25.39美元,2704人(6.1%)支付25.40美元至82.41美元,2703人(6.1%)首次治疗至少支付82.42美元,分别构成自付费用的第一、第二和第三三分位数。与零自付费用队列相比,第一三分位数队列多参加13.5%(95%CI,1.4%-27.1%;P = 0.028)的心脏康复治疗,第二和第三三分位数队列平均分别少参加11.9%(95%CI,-16.4%至-7.1%;P < 0.001)和30.9%(95CI,-40.8%至-19.4%;P < 0.001)的心脏康复治疗。首次心脏康复治疗每多自付10美元,患者平均少参加0.41次治疗(95%CI,-0.65至-0.17;P < 0.001)。
在有自付费用的患者中,费用越高与心脏康复依从性越低相关,且呈剂量依赖性。降低心脏康复的自付费用可能会提高有费用分担的受益人的依从性。