Disconnects between provider network directories and patient preferences.

OBJECTIVES

The question of what providers one has access to under their insurance coverage is crucial for patients in managed care. This study sought to examine information displayed in online provider directories and whether this information matched consumer preferences.

STUDY DESIGN

A national survey (N = 4007) paired with an analysis of online provider network directories.

METHODS

We conducted a quantitative content analysis of online provider directories from March 1 to May 30, 2023. A national survey of American adults was fielded from June 30 to July 2, 2023, to gauge preferences for information displayed in provider directories. Preferences and perceived importance of information elements that should be displayed in provider directories were contrasted with the data elements displayed in directories.

RESULTS

We found that provider directories showed wide variations with regard to information displayed and in the amount of navigation required by patients. There were widespread instances of disconnect between patient preferences and data availability. Important data items related to care access and provider quality that were preferred by consumers were not universally presented in directories, such as availability of telemedicine (23% presented), information about office hours (58%), and disability access (59%). Approximately 7% of directories did not indicate whether a provider was accepting new patients, despite the requirement under the No Surprises Act to display such information. Further, certain marginalized populations may find it especially challenging to acquire information about providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of attention to usability in provider directories may hinder the national goal of ensuring care accessibility for all.