• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型心房颤动治疗方法延迟采用的影响。

Impact of delayed adoption of novel atrial fibrillation treatments.

作者信息

Kim Jaehong, Nighohossian Jeremy, Daifotis Anastasia G, He Jinghua, Shafrin Jason

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Economics and Policy, FTI Consulting, 350 S Grande Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2024 Dec;30(12):674-680. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89639.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89639
PMID:39745511
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between adoption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and health and cost outcomes for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

STUDY DESIGN

Real-world cohort study.

METHODS

US adults who newly initiated treatment for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were identified from claims data. DOAC adoption and stroke rates were assessed at metropolitan statistical area (MSA) and individual levels. The MSA-level cross-sectional analysis examined the relationship between the adoption rate of a DOAC (vs warfarin) and an ischemic stroke. The individual-level instrumental variable analysis examined the impact of treatment choice predicted by regional adoption on stroke within 1 year after treatment initiation. Results were extrapolated to estimate the strokes and costs averted by patients moving from a slow-adopting (10th percentile) MSA to a rapid-adopting (90th percentile) MSA.

RESULTS

DOAC uptake rates in MSAs at the 10th and 90th uptake percentile were 53.1% and 78.5%, respectively, in 2014. Overall DOAC uptake increased from 66.3% in 2014 to 91.4% in 2018. Increased DOAC adoption reduced average stroke rates by 1.41 percentage points or 63.2% (P = .002) using the MSA-level descriptive analysis and 1.08 percentage points or 71.2% (P = .002) using the individual-level instrumental variable analysis. Nationally, shifting DOAC rates from those seen in slow-adopting MSAs to those seen in rapid-adopting MSAs could avert up to 32,000 strokes and save up to $1.04 billion annually.

CONCLUSIONS

More rapid adoption of newly approved nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treatments was associated with reduced stroke rates and high cost savings. Managed care organizations should consider how delays in the uptake of innovative medications impact health and economic outcomes.

摘要

目的

研究非瓣膜性心房颤动患者采用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与健康及成本结果之间的关系。

研究设计

真实世界队列研究。

方法

从索赔数据中识别出开始接受非瓣膜性心房颤动新治疗的美国成年人。在大都市统计区(MSA)和个体层面评估DOAC的采用情况和中风发生率。MSA层面的横断面分析研究了DOAC(与华法林相比)的采用率与缺血性中风之间的关系。个体层面的工具变量分析研究了区域采用情况预测的治疗选择对治疗开始后1年内中风的影响。结果被外推以估计从采用缓慢(第10百分位数)的MSA转移到采用迅速(第90百分位数)的MSA的患者避免的中风和成本。

结果

2014年,采用率处于第10百分位数和第90百分位数的MSA中,DOAC的采用率分别为53.1%和78.5%。DOAC的总体采用率从2014年的66.3%增至2018年的91.4%。采用MSA层面的描述性分析,DOAC采用率的提高使平均中风发生率降低了1.41个百分点或63.2%(P = 0.002);采用个体层面的工具变量分析,降低了1.08个百分点或71.2%(P = 0.002)。在全国范围内,将DOAC的采用率从采用缓慢的MSA的水平转变为采用迅速的MSA的水平,每年最多可避免32,000例中风,并节省高达10.4亿美元。

结论

更快地采用新批准的非瓣膜性心房颤动治疗方法与中风发生率降低和高成本节约相关。管理式医疗组织应考虑创新药物采用延迟如何影响健康和经济结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of delayed adoption of novel atrial fibrillation treatments.新型心房颤动治疗方法延迟采用的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Dec;30(12):674-680. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89639.
2
Adoption of direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.采用直接口服抗凝剂预防心房颤动中的脑卒中。
Intern Med J. 2016 Jul;46(7):792-7. doi: 10.1111/imj.13088.
3
Impact of non-adherence to direct oral anticoagulants amongst Swedish patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a real-world cost-utility analysis.非瓣膜性心房颤动瑞典患者不依从直接口服抗凝剂的影响:来自真实世界成本效用分析的结果。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1085-1091. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2116848.
4
Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use Among 436 864 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Community Practice, 2011 to 2020.2011 年至 2020 年社区实践中 436864 例房颤患者口服抗凝剂使用趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026723. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026723. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性比较:一项加拿大多中心观察性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
6
Comparison of Drug Switching and Discontinuation Rates in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States.美国使用直接口服抗凝剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的药物转换和停药率比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):162-174. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0840-8. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Periprocedural Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的围手术期结局。
Circulation. 2018 Oct 2;138(14):1402-1411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031457.
8
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Adults With Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在癌症合并心房颤动成人患者中的疗效和安全性比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Dec;15(12):e008951. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008951. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Patterns of initiation of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation- quality and cost implications.房颤患者口服抗凝剂起始治疗的模式-质量和成本影响。
Am J Med. 2014 Nov;127(11):1075-1082.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 May 21.
10
Factors That Affect Time to Switch From Warfarin to a Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Change in the Reimbursement Criteria in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者报销标准变更后,影响从华法林转换为直接口服抗凝剂时间的因素。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;25(1):57-64. doi: 10.1177/1074248419868996. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis model for sotagliflozin compared with insulin monotherapy for patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.索格列净与胰岛素单药治疗1型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者的成本效益分析模型
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jul;31(7):641-650. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.7.641.