• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性比较:一项加拿大多中心观察性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Anticoagulants in Adults with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Coronary/Peripheral Artery Disease.非瓣膜性心房颤动合并冠状动脉/外周动脉疾病成人患者抗凝治疗的有效性和安全性。
Am J Med. 2018 Sep;131(9):1075-1085.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 26.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
4
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.真实世界环境中比较非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药与维生素 K 拮抗剂预防心房颤动卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and/or Peripheral Artery Disease.非瓣膜性心房颤动合并冠状动脉疾病和/或外周动脉疾病患者的临床和经济结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: The NAXOS Study.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的安全性和有效性比较:NAXOS 研究。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2066-2075. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028825. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Real-World Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Health Care Costs of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the U.S. Department of Defense Population.美国国防部人群中非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的真实世界比较有效性、安全性和医疗保健成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Nov;24(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17488. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Four Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.四种直接口服抗凝剂在亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的有效性和安全性。
Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):529-543. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.108. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail elderly patients: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study. frail elderly patients: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study.
J Intern Med. 2021 Jan;289(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/joim.13140. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative clinical outcomes of acenocoumarol versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: real-world-evidence (SIESTA-A study).醋硝香豆素与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)及华法林用于心房颤动患者的临床疗效比较:真实世界证据(SIESTA-A研究)
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1548298. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548298. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在房颤合并肝病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2025 May 30;10:e78-e88. doi: 10.5114/amsad/205549. eCollection 2025.
3
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A narrative review of current evidence and emerging strategies.心房颤动的卒中预防:当前证据与新兴策略的叙述性综述
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Sep;55(9):e70082. doi: 10.1111/eci.70082. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
4
Risk of mortality between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants: population-based cohort studies.华法林与直接口服抗凝剂之间的死亡率风险:基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 23;22(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03808-y.
5
More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.心房颤动中与高基线直接口服抗凝剂水平相关的早期出血更多:MAS研究
Blood Adv. 2024 Sep 24;8(18):4913-4923. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013126.
6
Development and Application of an Attribute-Based Taxonomy on the Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Switching in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delphi Study.基于属性的房颤患者口服抗凝药物转换获益分类法的制定与应用:一项德尔菲研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2352-2366. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02859-0. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people.老年人药物警戒研究的创新
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;91(1):66-83. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16049. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
8
Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.与房颤患者低基线直接口服抗凝剂水平相关的血栓栓塞事件:MAS 研究。
Blood Adv. 2024 Apr 23;8(8):1846-1856. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012408.
9
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study in primary healthcare in Catalonia.口服抗凝剂用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性:加泰罗尼亚初级医疗保健中的一项基于人群的队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 15;14:1237454. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237454. eCollection 2023.
10
Deciphering the Dilemma: Anticoagulation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).解读困境:射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)的抗凝治疗
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43279. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis.非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的应用:一项网状荟萃分析。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Apr;53(2):48-54. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1594353. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Comparative Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Older Medicare Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.老年 Medicare 患者口服抗凝药治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中、出血和死亡率比较。
Am J Med. 2019 May;132(5):596-604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
5
Treatment Persistence in Atrial Fibrillation: The Next Major Hurdle.心房颤动治疗的持久性:下一个主要障碍。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2018-2019. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676101. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
2018 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.2018 年加拿大心血管学会心房颤动管理指南重点更新。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1371-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.026.
7
Interventions for Preventing Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.房颤患者预防血栓栓塞事件的干预措施:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):774-787. doi: 10.7326/M18-1523. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
Safety and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation - a network meta-analysis of real-world data.直接作用口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的安全性和有效性——基于真实世界数据的网状荟萃分析
Vasa. 2019 Mar;48(2):134-147. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000746. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
9
Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在真实世界环境中的风险和获益:初级保健中的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 4;362:k2505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2505.
10
Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban vs. high TTR warfarin in atrial fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与房颤中高 TTR 的华法林比较。
Thromb Res. 2018 Jul;167:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 17.

直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性比较:一项加拿大多中心观察性队列研究。

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.

作者信息

Durand Madeleine, Schnitzer Mireille E, Pang Menglan, Carney Greg, Eltonsy Sherif, Filion Kristian B, Fisher Anat, Jun Min, Kuo I Fan, Renoux Christel, Paterson J Michael, Quail Jacqueline, Matteau Alexis

机构信息

Internal Medicine Service (Durand), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) and CHUM Research Centre (Durand); Faculty of Pharmacy (Schnitzer) and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine (Schnitzer), Université de Montréal; Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (Schnitzer, Pang, Filion, Renoux), Medicine (Filion) and Neurology and Neurosurgery (Renoux), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Departments of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Carney, Fisher), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; College of Pharmacy (Eltonsy, Kuo), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology (Filion, Renoux), Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; The George Institute for Global Health (Jun), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; ICES Central (Paterson); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Paterson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Quality Council (Quail) and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Quail), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.; Cardiology Service (Matteau), CHUM and CHUM Research Centre, Montréal, Que.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20200055
PMID:33355273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Canadian setting.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based observational multicentre cohort study with propensity score matching and subsequent meta-analysis. We used health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated anticoagulation therapy in 2009-2017 were matched to an equal number who initiated warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included pooled HRs for major bleeding; a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality; and myocardial infarction. We modelled HRs using proportional hazard Cox regression with inverse probability of censoring weights, and estimated pooled HRs with random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with a DOAC (40 503 dabigatran, 49 498 rivaroxaban and 38 272 apixaban) and 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with warfarin. The pooled HR for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization comparing DOACs to warfarin was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.19). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with lower rates of major bleeding (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), the composite outcome (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85).

INTERPRETATION

In this real-world study, DOACs were associated with similar risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and lower risks of bleeding and total mortality compared to warfarin. These findings support the use of DOACs for anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03596502.

摘要

背景

在非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中预防中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已广泛取代华法林。我们的目的是比较在加拿大环境下,DOACs(达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班)与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中预防方面的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项基于人群的观察性多中心队列研究,并进行倾向评分匹配及后续的荟萃分析。我们使用了来自加拿大7个省份(不列颠哥伦比亚省、艾伯塔省、萨斯喀彻温省、马尼托巴省、安大略省、魁北克省和新斯科舍省)的医疗保健数据库。2009年至2017年开始抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者与开始使用华法林的同等数量患者进行匹配。主要结局是缺血性卒中或全身性栓塞的合并风险比(HR)。次要结局包括大出血的合并HR;卒中、全身性栓塞、大出血和全因死亡率的复合结局;以及心肌梗死。我们使用比例风险Cox回归模型,采用逆概率删失权重法对HR进行建模,并通过随机效应荟萃分析估计合并HR。

结果

我们纳入了128273例开始使用DOACs进行抗凝治疗的患者(40503例使用达比加群,49498例使用利伐沙班,38272例使用阿哌沙班)和128273例开始使用华法林进行抗凝治疗的患者。与华法林相比,DOACs在缺血性卒中或全身性栓塞方面的合并HR为1.02(95%置信区间[CI]为0.87至1.19)。直接口服抗凝剂与较低的大出血发生率(合并HR为0.81,95%CI为0.69至0.97)、复合结局发生率(合并HR为0.81,95%CI为0.74至0.89)和全因死亡率(合并HR为0.81,95%CI为0.78至0.85)相关。

解读

在这项真实世界研究中,与华法林相比,DOACs在缺血性卒中或全身性栓塞方面的风险相似,而在出血和总死亡率方面的风险较低。这些发现支持在非瓣膜性心房颤动中使用DOACs进行抗凝治疗。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,编号NCT03596502。