Menegaz de Almeida Artur, Oliveira Paloma, Lopes Lucca, Leite Marianna, Morbach Victória, Alves Kelly Francinny, Barros Ítalo, Aquino de Moraes Francisco Cezar, Prevedello Alexandra
Federal University of Mato Grosso, Sinop, Mato Grosso, Sciences Medical School of Santos, Santos, Santa Marcelina College of Medicine, São Paulo, and Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, São Paulo, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Santo Agostinho Faculty, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, and Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar 1;145(3):253-261. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005812. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
To assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant and elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until August 22, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov . The following words made up the search strategy, which was applied to the three databases: fezolinetant, elinzanetant, vasomotor symptoms, and menopause.
Only RCTs comparing fezolinetant and elinzanetant with placebo for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women were included.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We extracted the number of patients, mean age, body mass index (BMI), and number of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Data were examined with the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. R 4.3.2 was used for statistical analysis. Seven RCTs with 4,087 patients were included in the analysis. Fezolinetant and elinzanetant were associated with diminished vasomotor symptom frequency: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 2.16, 95% CI, 1.54-2.79, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 2.54, 95% CI, 1.86-3.21, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 2.99, 95% CI, 1.74-4.23, I2 =0%). Both drugs also showed a decrease in vasomotor symptom severity: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 0.20, 95% CI, 0.09-0.33, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13-0.34, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 0.36, 95% CI, 0.26-0.46, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg showed a significant improvement in sleep quality (mean difference 4.65, 95% CI, 3.73-5.56, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg was associated with the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (11.70% vs 20.75%, risk ratio [RR] 0.57, 95% CI, 0.39-0.82, I2 =19%) and headache (2.54% vs 8.0%, RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.16-0.64, I2 =0%).
In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that fezolinetant and elinzanetant are associated with beneficial outcomes in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Elinzanetant provided a larger effect size in vasomotor symptom frequency and severity reduction and greatly improved sleep quality compared with fezolinetant.
PROSPERO, CRD42023469952.
评估非唑啉坦和依林扎坦治疗绝经后女性血管舒缩症状的疗效和安全性。
对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索,直至2024年8月22日。由于Cochrane图书馆包含了所有已识别的随机对照试验(RCT),因此无需检索ClinicalTrials.gov。以下词汇构成了检索策略,并应用于这三个数据库:非唑啉坦、依林扎坦、血管舒缩症状和绝经。
仅纳入比较非唑啉坦和依林扎坦与安慰剂治疗绝经后女性血管舒缩症状的RCT。
制表、整合与结果:我们提取了患者数量、平均年龄、体重指数(BMI)以及接受卵巢切除术的患者数量。数据采用Mantel-Haenszel方法和95%置信区间进行检验。异质性用I²统计量进行评估。使用R 4.3.2进行统计分析。分析纳入了7项RCT,共4087例患者。非唑啉坦和依林扎坦与血管舒缩症状频率降低相关:非唑啉坦30mg(平均差值2.16,95%置信区间,1.54 - 2.79,I² = 0%),非唑啉坦45mg(平均差值2.54,95%置信区间,1.86 - 3.21,I² = 0%),依林扎坦120mg(平均差值2.99,95%置信区间,1.74 - 4.23,I² = 0%)。两种药物还显示血管舒缩症状严重程度降低:非唑啉坦30mg(平均差值0.20,95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.33,I² = 0%),非唑啉坦45mg(平均差值0.24,95%置信区间,0.13 - 0.34,I² = 0%),依林扎坦120mg(平均差值0.36,95%置信区间,0.26 - 0.46,I² = 0%)。依林扎坦120mg在睡眠质量方面有显著改善(平均差值4.65,95%置信区间,3.73 - 5.56,I² = 0%)。依林扎坦120mg与药物相关不良事件的发生相关(11.70%对20.75%,风险比[RR] 0.57,95%置信区间,0.39 - 0.82,I² = 19%)以及头痛(2.54%对8.0%,RR 0.32,95%置信区间,0.16 - 0.64,I² = 0%)。
在这项荟萃分析中,一致的结果表明非唑啉坦和依林扎坦与有血管舒缩症状的绝经后女性有益的结局相关。与非唑啉坦相比,依林扎坦在降低血管舒缩症状频率和严重程度方面效果更显著,并极大地改善了睡眠质量。
PROSPERO,CRD42023469952。