Zhang Tongzhou, Zhao Yilin, Adams Roger, Malliaras Peter, Witchalls Jeremy, Fu Weijie, Han Jia
Shanxi Institute of Sport Science, 030012, Shanxi, China.
Suzhou Municipal Hospital, 215002, Suzhou, China.
Phys Ther Sport. 2025 Jan;71:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.12.006. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
To investigate the effects of different directions of athletic taping on neuromuscular control of the lower limb in recreational athletes with Achilles tendinopathy (AT).
Crossover Study.
Functional assessment laboratory.
Thirty recreational athletes with AT.
Participants were randomly treated with anti-pronation taping, anti-supination taping, or no-taping. Under different taping conditions, neuromuscular tests were performed in random order: ankle proprioception Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA), Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT), single leg hop test, figure-of-eight hop test and Lower Extremity Functional Test (LEFT).
Compared with no-taping, both anti-pronation taping and anti-supination taping significantly improved AMEDA proprioception test scores (p < 0.001,η = 0.466), figure-of-eight hop performance (p < 0.001,η = 0.307), unilateral LEFT scores (p < 0.001,η = 0.448), and may reduce risk of lower limb injury in recreational athletes with AT (p < 0.001,η = 0.432). Taping significantly reduced WBLT values (p < 0.001,η = 0.259) but had no significant effect on single leg hop test scores (p = 0.139). Importantly, no difference between the two taping conditions was observed.
Both directions of athletic taping were equally effective in improving ankle proprioception, lower extremity functional performance, and reducing the risk of injury in athletes with AT, but had no significant effect on lower limb explosive strength and were associated with significantly reduced ankle dorsiflexion.
探讨不同方向的运动贴扎对患有跟腱病(AT)的业余运动员下肢神经肌肉控制的影响。
交叉研究。
功能评估实验室。
30名患有AT的业余运动员。
参与者被随机采用抗内翻贴扎、抗外翻贴扎或不贴扎治疗。在不同的贴扎条件下,随机顺序进行神经肌肉测试:踝关节本体感觉主动运动范围辨别评估(AMEDA)、负重弓步试验(WBLT)、单腿跳测试、8字跳测试和下肢功能测试(LEFT)。
与不贴扎相比,抗内翻贴扎和抗外翻贴扎均显著提高了AMEDA本体感觉测试分数(p<0.001,η=0.466)、8字跳表现(p<0.001,η=0.307)、单侧LEFT分数(p<0.001,η=0.448),并可能降低患有AT的业余运动员下肢受伤风险(p<0.001,η=0.432)。贴扎显著降低了WBLT值(p<0.001,η=0.259),但对单腿跳测试分数没有显著影响(p=0.139)。重要的是,两种贴扎条件之间未观察到差异。
两种方向的运动贴扎在改善踝关节本体感觉、下肢功能表现以及降低患有AT的运动员受伤风险方面同样有效,但对下肢爆发力没有显著影响,且与踝关节背屈显著降低有关。