Rabheru Reema, Langan Anne, Merriweather Judith, Connolly Bronwen, Whelan Kevin, Bear Danielle E
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Mar;121(3):703-723. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.028. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
Surviving critical illness leads to prolonged physical and functional recovery with both nutritional and physical rehabilitation interventions for prevention and treatment being investigated. Nutritional status and adequacy may influence outcome, but no consensus on which nutritional-related variables should be measured and reported in clinical trials exists.
This study aimed to undertake a systematic review investigating the reporting of nutritional screening, nutritional status, and nutritional intake/delivery in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating nutritional and/or physical rehabilitation on physical and functional recovery during and following critical illness.
Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane) were searched (last update 9 August, 2023). Search terms included both free text and standardized indexed terms. Studies included were RCTs assessing nutritional and/or physical interventions either during or following intensive care unit (ICU) admission in adults (18 y or older) with critical illness, and who required invasive mechanical ventilation for any duration during ICU admission. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and descriptive data synthesis was performed and presented as counts (%). n t RESULTS: In total, 123 RCTs (30 nutritional, 87 physical function, and 6 combined) were included. Further, ≥1 nutritional variable was measured and/or reported in 99 (80%) of the studies including BMI (n = 69), body weight (n = 57), nutritional status (n = 11), nutritional risk (n = 10), energy delivery (n = 41), protein delivery (n = 35), handgrip strength (n = 40), and other nutritional-related muscle variables (n = 41). Only 3 studies were considered to have low risk of bias in all categories.
Few RCTs of physical rehabilitation measure and report nutritional or related variables. Future studies should measure and report specific nutritional factors that could impact physical and functional recovery to support interpretation where studies do not show benefit. This protocol was preregistered at PROSPERO as CRD42022315122.
危重症幸存者会经历漫长的身体和功能恢复过程,目前正在对营养和身体康复干预措施进行研究,以用于预防和治疗。营养状况和充足程度可能会影响治疗结果,但对于在临床试验中应测量和报告哪些营养相关变量尚无共识。
本研究旨在进行一项系统评价,调查在评估营养和/或身体康复对危重症期间及之后身体和功能恢复影响的随机对照试验(RCT)中,营养筛查、营养状况和营养摄入/供给情况的报告。
检索了五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane)(最后更新时间为2023年8月9日)。检索词包括自由文本和标准化索引词。纳入的研究为RCT,评估针对成年(18岁及以上)危重症患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间或之后进行的营养和/或身体干预措施,且这些患者在ICU住院期间需要接受任何时长的有创机械通气。使用Cochrane协作网随机对照试验偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,并进行描述性数据综合分析,并以计数(%)形式呈现。
总共纳入了123项随机对照试验(30项营养相关试验、87项身体功能试验和6项综合试验)。此外,99项(80%)研究测量和/或报告了≥1个营养变量,包括体重指数(n = 69)、体重(n = 57)、营养状况(n = 11)、营养风险(n = 10)、能量供给(n = 41)、蛋白质供给(n = 35)、握力(n = 40)以及其他与营养相关的肌肉变量(n = 41)。只有3项研究在所有类别中被认为偏倚风险较低。
很少有身体康复方面的随机对照试验测量和报告营养或相关变量。未来的研究应测量和报告可能影响身体和功能恢复的特定营养因素,以便在研究未显示出益处时支持解读。本方案已在PROSPERO预先注册,注册号为CRD42022315122。