Edelmann Frank, Wachter Rolf, Duvinage André, Mueller Stephan, Fegers-Wustrow Isabel, Schwarz Silja, Christle Jeffrey W, Pieske-Kraigher Elisabeth, Seyfarth Melchior, Knapp Markus, Dörr Marcus, Nolte Kathleen, Düngen Hans-Dirk, Herrmann-Lingen Christoph, Esefeld Katrin, Hagendorff Andreas, Haykowsky Mark J, Hasenfuss Gerd, Holzendorf Volker, Prettin Christiane, Mende Meinhard, Pieske Burkert, Halle Martin
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):306-314. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03342-7. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
Endurance exercise training (ET) is an effective treatment in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the efficacy of resistance training in this patient population has been only scarcely evaluated. In this multicenter, randomized trial, we evaluated the effects of combined endurance and resistance training over 12 months in patients with HFpEF. The primary endpoint was a modified Packer score, including all-cause mortality, hospitalizations classified as potentially related to heart failure or exercise and changes in peak oxygen consumption ( ), diastolic function (E/e'), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and global self-assessment (GSA). In total, 322 patients (mean age, 70 years; 192 females (59.6%) and 130 males (40.4%)) were randomized (1:1) to ET or usual care (UC). At 12 months, the modified Packer score showed an improvement in 33 ET patients (20.5%) and in 13 UC patients (8.1%) and showed a worsening in 69 ET patients (42.9%) and in 71 UC patients (44.1%) (Kendall's tau-b = -0.073, P = 0.17). Although the primary endpoint was not met, clinically relevant differences favoring the ET group as compared to the UC group were observed for the following secondary endpoints: changes in peak (mean difference, 1.3 ml kg min (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-2.1)) and NYHA class (odds ratio = 7.77 (95% CI: 3.73-16.21)). No significant between-group differences were observed for other secondary endpoints, including change in E/e', change in GSA, time to cardiovascular hospitalization or all-cause mortality. In conclusion, 1 year of combined endurance and resistance ET did not result in a significantly better modified Packer score, but it did result in improvements in important clinical parameters, such as peak and NYHA class, as compared to UC. ISRCTN registration: ISRCTN86879094 .
耐力运动训练(ET)是射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)的一种有效治疗方法,但针对该患者群体的阻力训练效果评估甚少。在这项多中心随机试验中,我们评估了12个月的耐力与阻力联合训练对HFpEF患者的影响。主要终点是改良的帕克评分,包括全因死亡率、归类为可能与心力衰竭或运动相关的住院情况以及峰值耗氧量( )、舒张功能(E/e')、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级和整体自我评估(GSA)的变化。总共322例患者(平均年龄70岁;192例女性(59.6%)和130例男性(40.4%))被随机(1:1)分为ET组或常规治疗(UC)组。12个月时,改良的帕克评分显示33例ET组患者(20.5%)有所改善,13例UC组患者(8.1%)有所改善,69例ET组患者(42.9%)病情恶化,71例UC组患者(44.1%)病情恶化(肯德尔tau-b系数=-0.073,P=0.17)。虽然未达到主要终点,但在以下次要终点观察到与UC组相比,ET组存在有利于ET组的临床相关差异:峰值 的变化(平均差异1.3 ml·kg·min(95%置信区间(CI):0.4 - 2.1))和NYHA心功能分级(优势比=7.77(95%CI:3.73 - 16.21))。在其他次要终点未观察到显著的组间差异,包括E/e'的变化、GSA的变化、心血管住院时间或全因死亡率。总之,与UC组相比,1年的耐力与阻力联合ET并未使改良的帕克评分显著改善,但确实使重要临床参数如峰值 和NYHA心功能分级得到改善。国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN86879094 。