Kuculmez Ozlem, Dündar Ahi Emine, Cosar Sacide Nur, Guzel Sukran
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baskent University Alanya Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kocaeli Health and Technology University, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 19;11:1429660. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1429660. eCollection 2024.
High-frequency laser therapy has been increasingly used in several musculoskeletal disorders, but there is still a lack of evidence for the usage of the device in neck pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of physiotherapy, high-frequency laser, and exercise therapy methods in the treatment of pain in cervical disk herniation.
It was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients aged between 18 and 65 with neck pain and a diagnosis of cervical disk hernia were included in the study. Patients with a history of cervical surgery, rheumatism, cancer, or pacemaker were excluded from the study. The patients were randomized into 15 sessions of physiotherapy, high-frequency laser, or exercise therapy groups and evaluated with a range of motion, visual analog score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36 before treatment, after treatment, and in 1st and 3rd months. < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In total, 150 patients were analyzed. There was a significant improvement in range of motion, visual analog score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36 scores in three groups after 3-month follow-up ( < 0.05). The improvement was statistically greater in the physiotherapy and high-frequency laser therapy groups ( < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between these two groups ( > 0.05).
The results in the physiotherapy and high-frequency laser therapy groups were better than the exercise group. They may be alternatives to each other in cervical disk hernia treatment.
高频激光疗法已越来越多地应用于多种肌肉骨骼疾病,但该设备在颈部疼痛治疗中的应用仍缺乏证据。本研究旨在比较物理治疗、高频激光和运动疗法在治疗颈椎间盘突出症疼痛方面的有效性。
这是一项多中心、随机、对照临床试验。年龄在18至65岁之间、有颈部疼痛且诊断为颈椎间盘突出症的患者纳入本研究。有颈椎手术史、风湿病史、癌症或装有起搏器的患者被排除在研究之外。患者被随机分为接受15次物理治疗、高频激光治疗或运动疗法的组,并在治疗前、治疗后以及第1个月和第3个月时通过活动范围、视觉模拟评分、颈部残疾指数和简短健康调查问卷-36进行评估。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
总共分析了150名患者。3个月随访后,三组患者的活动范围、视觉模拟评分、颈部残疾指数和简短健康调查问卷-36评分均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。物理治疗组和高频激光治疗组的改善在统计学上更显著(P < 0.05),但这两组之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
物理治疗组和高频激光治疗组的结果优于运动组。在颈椎间盘突出症治疗中,它们可能互为替代方法。