Hatch K D, Shingleton H M, Orr J W, Gore H, Soong S J
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar;65(3):403-8.
Two-thousand three-hundred and four patients with abnormal cervical cytology were evaluated by colposcopy, cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage. The endocervical curettage was more accurate than the cervical biopsy in 1.2% of patients with satisfactory colposcopic examinations, 15.7% of patients with unsatisfactory examinations, and 30.5% of patients with no lesions observed. The endocervical curettage contained neoplastic epithelium in all 15 of the patients with invasive cancer and in seven patients it was the only diagnostic parameter that indicated invasion. The information from the endocervical curettage, when correlated with the cervical cytology, colposcopic findings, and cervical biopsy, eliminated the need to do a diagnostic conization in 76% of patients with unsatisfactory examinations and 79% of patients with no lesion identified. It is recommended that the endocervical curettage be a part of every colposcopic examination.
对2304例宫颈细胞学异常患者进行了阴道镜检查、宫颈活检和宫颈管刮术。在阴道镜检查满意的患者中,1.2%的病例宫颈管刮术比宫颈活检更准确;在检查不满意的患者中,这一比例为15.7%;在未观察到病变的患者中,这一比例为30.5%。在所有15例浸润癌患者中,宫颈管刮术均发现了肿瘤上皮,且在7例患者中,它是唯一提示浸润的诊断参数。当将宫颈管刮术的信息与宫颈细胞学、阴道镜检查结果及宫颈活检结果相关联时,76%检查不满意的患者和79%未发现病变的患者无需进行诊断性锥切术。建议宫颈管刮术应成为每次阴道镜检查的一部分。