Woolley Connor E, Domingo Enric, Fernandez-Tajes Juan, Pennel Kathryn A F, Roxburgh Patricia, Edwards Joanne, Richman Susan D, Maughan Tim S, Kerr David J, Soriano Ignacio, Tomlinson Ian P M
Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
School of Cancer Science, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Mol Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 1;23(4):300-312. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-24-0464.
BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer comprise three functional classes: class 1 (V600E) with strong constitutive activation, class 2 with pathogenic kinase activity lower than that of class 1, and class 3 which paradoxically lacks kinase activity. Non-class 1 mutations associate with better prognosis, microsatellite stability, distal tumor location, and better anti-EGFR response. An analysis of 13 colorectal cancer cohorts (n = 6,605 tumors) compared class 1 (n = 709, 10.7% of colorectal cancers), class 2 (n = 31, 0.47%), and class 3 (n = 81, 1.22%) mutations. Class 2-mutant and class 3-mutant colorectal cancers frequently co-occurred with additional Ras pathway mutations (29.0% and 45.7%, respectively, vs. 2.40% in class 1; P < 0.001), often at atypical sites (KRAS noncodon 12/13/61, NRAS, or NF1). Ras pathway activation was highest in class 1 and lowest in class 3, with a greater distal expression of EGFR ligands (amphiregulin/epiregulin) supporting weaker BRAF driver mutations. Unlike class 1 mutants, class 3 tumors resembled chromosomally unstable colorectal cancers in mutation burdens, signatures, driver mutations, and transcriptional subtypes, whereas class 2 mutants displayed intermediate characteristics. Atypical BRAF mutations were associated with longer overall survival than class 1 mutations (HR = 0.25; P = 0.011) but lost this advantage in cancers with additional Ras mutations (HR = 0.94; P = 0.86). This study supports the suggestion that class 3 BRAF mutations amplify existing Ras signaling in a two-mutation model and that the enhancement of weak/atypical Ras mutations may suffice for tumorigenesis, with potentially clinically important heterogeneity in the class 2/3 subgroup. Implications: The heterogeneous nature of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers, particularly among class 2/3 mutations which frequently harbor additional Ras mutations, highlights the necessity of comprehensive molecular profiling.
结直肠癌中的BRAF突变包括三个功能类别:第1类(V600E)具有强烈的组成性激活;第2类具有低于第1类的致病性激酶活性;第3类则反常地缺乏激酶活性。非第1类突变与更好的预后、微卫星稳定性、肿瘤远端定位以及更好的抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)反应相关。一项对13个结直肠癌队列(共6605个肿瘤)的分析比较了第1类(709个,占结直肠癌的10.7%)、第2类(31个,占0.47%)和第3类(81个,占1.22%)突变。第2类突变和第3类突变的结直肠癌经常与其他Ras通路突变同时出现(分别为29.0%和45.7%,而第1类为2.40%;P<0.001),且这些突变常位于非典型位点(KRAS非密码子12/13/61、NRAS或NF1)。Ras通路激活在第1类中最高,在第3类中最低,EGFR配体(双调蛋白/表皮调节素)在远端的表达更高,这支持了较弱的BRAF驱动突变。与第1类突变不同,第3类肿瘤在突变负担、特征、驱动突变和转录亚型方面类似于染色体不稳定的结直肠癌,而第2类突变则表现出中间特征。非典型BRAF突变与比第1类突变更长的总生存期相关(风险比=0.25;P=0.011),但在伴有其他Ras突变的癌症中失去了这一优势(风险比=0.94;P=0.86)。这项研究支持了以下观点:第3类BRAF突变在双突变模型中放大了现有的Ras信号传导,并且弱/非典型Ras突变的增强可能足以引发肿瘤发生,在第2/3亚组中存在潜在的具有临床重要性的异质性。启示:BRAF突变型结直肠癌的异质性,特别是在经常伴有其他Ras突变的第2/3类突变中,凸显了全面分子谱分析的必要性。