一线免疫联合治疗或舒尼替尼用于低危转移性肾细胞癌:来自ARON-1研究的真实世界回顾性比较

First-line immune-based combinations or sunitinib in favorable-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective comparison from the ARON-1 study.

作者信息

Roviello Giandomenico, Molina-Cerrillo Javier, Massari Francesco, Cerbone Linda, Fiala Ondrej, Fornarini Giuseppe, Monteiro Fernando Sabino Marques, Cattrini Carlo, Landmesser Johannes, Messina Carlo, Zgura Anca, Rebuzzi Sara Elena, Soares Andrey, Carrozza Francesco, Ansari Jawaher, Grillone Francesco, Küronya Zsófia, Incorvaia Lorena, Bhuva Dipen, Ortega Cinzia, Nasso Cecilia, Kanesvaran Ravindran, Zampiva Ilaria, Porta Camillo, Buti Sebastiano, Santoni Matteo

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 Jan 3;74(2):65. doi: 10.1007/s00262-024-03897-x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common types of urogenital cancer. The introduction of immune-based combinations, including dual immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has radically changed the treatment landscape for metastatic RCC, showing varying efficacy across different prognostic groups based on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study, part of the ARON-1 project, aimed to evaluate the outcomes of favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients treated with immune-based combinations or sunitinib. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 524 favorable-risk patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, the median OS in the overall population was 56.1 months. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving sunitinib and those receiving TKI + ICI combinations (p = 0.761). Patients on TKI + ICI had significantly longer PFS compared to patient treated with sunitinib (30.7 vs 22.9 months, p = 0.007). Analysis of OS and PFS based on metastatic site revealed that patients with bone metastases benefited more from ICI plus TKI (56 patients with bone metastases receiving IO + TKI, 38 received pembrolizumab plus axitinib, 15 cabozantinib plus nivolumab and 3 pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib), while sunitinib was more effective for pancreatic and glandular metastases. Additionally, the number of metastatic sites played a role, with TKI plus ICI showing superiority in patients with a single metastatic site. The time from RCC diagnosis to metastatic disease also impacted outcomes, with TKI plus ICI being more effective in patients with a shorter interval (i.e., < 36 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice between upfront combination or monotherapy for metastatic favorable prognosis RCC remains a current issue. While combination therapy offers prolonged PFS, it does not necessarily translate to improve OS compared to sunitinib. This real-world study supports the superiority in terms of PFS of TKI plus ICI vs TKI monotherapy but not in OS. Probable, other clinical factors should be taking into account to make clinical treatment decisions in this setting.

摘要

引言

肾细胞癌(RCC)是泌尿生殖系统癌症中最常见的类型之一。包括双重免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)或ICI联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)在内的基于免疫的联合疗法的引入,彻底改变了转移性RCC的治疗格局,根据国际转移性RCC数据库联盟(IMDC)标准,在不同预后组中显示出不同的疗效。

材料与方法

这项回顾性多中心研究是ARON-1项目的一部分,旨在评估接受基于免疫的联合疗法或舒尼替尼治疗的低危转移性RCC患者的预后。评估患者的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总缓解率。我们通过Cox回归模型进行生存分析。

结果

共有524例低危患者纳入分析。中位随访37.2个月后,总体人群的中位OS为56.1个月。接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者与接受TKI+ICI联合治疗的患者的OS无显著差异(p=0.761)。与接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者相比,接受TKI+ICI联合治疗的患者的PFS显著更长(30.7个月对22.9个月,p=0.007)。基于转移部位的OS和PFS分析显示,骨转移患者从ICI联合TKI中获益更多(56例骨转移患者接受IO+TKI,38例接受帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼,15例接受卡博替尼联合纳武利尤单抗,3例接受帕博利珠单抗联合乐伐替尼),而舒尼替尼对胰腺和腺转移更有效。此外,转移部位的数量也起作用,TKI联合ICI在单个转移部位的患者中显示出优势。从RCC诊断到转移疾病的时间也影响预后,TKI联合ICI在间隔时间较短(即<36个月)的患者中更有效。

结论

对于转移性预后良好的RCC, upfront联合治疗或单药治疗之间的选择仍然是当前的一个问题。虽然联合治疗可延长PFS,但与舒尼替尼相比,不一定能改善OS。这项真实世界研究支持TKI联合ICI在PFS方面优于TKI单药治疗,但在OS方面并非如此。在这种情况下,可能应考虑其他临床因素以做出临床治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58d/11699065/012ad9221e31/262_2024_3897_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索