Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cancer Med. 2021 Apr;10(7):2341-2349. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3812. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Two separate antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) combinations are FDA-approved as front-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Little is known about off-protocol and post-front-line experience with combination TKI-IO approaches.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of mRCC patients who received combination TKI-IO post-first-line therapy between November 2015 and January 2019 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Chart review detailed patient characteristics, treatments, toxicity, and survival. Independent radiologists, blinded to clinical data, assessed best radiographic response using RECIST v1.1.
We identified 48 mRCC patients for inclusion: median age 65 years, 75.0% clear cell histology, 68.8% IMDC intermediate risk, and median two prior systemic therapies. TKI-IO combinations included nivolumab-cabozantinib (N +C; 24 patients), nivolumab-pazopanib (N+P; 13), nivolumab-axitinib (6), nivolumab-lenvatinib (2), and nivolumab-ipilimumab-cabozantinib (3). The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Response data were available in 45 patients: complete response (CR; n = 3, 6.7%), partial response (PR; 20, 44.4%), stable disease (SD; 19, 42.2%), and progressive disease (3, 6.7%). Overall response rate was 51% and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 93%. Only one patient had a grade ≥3 adverse event.
To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting off-label use of combination TKI-IO for mRCC. TKI-IO combinations, particularly N+P and N+C, are well tolerated and efficacious. Although further prospective research is essential, slow disease progression on IO or TKI monotherapy may be safely controlled with addition of either TKI or IO.
两种不同的抗血管生成酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和免疫疗法(IO)联合方案已获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,作为转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线治疗方法。对于 TKI-IO 联合方案的非方案治疗和一线治疗后的经验,人们知之甚少。
我们对 2015 年 11 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在 MD 安德森癌症中心和杜克癌症研究所接受一线治疗后接受 TKI-IO 联合方案治疗的 mRCC 患者进行了回顾性分析。图表回顾详细记录了患者的特征、治疗、毒性和生存情况。独立的放射科医生,对临床数据不知情,使用 RECIST v1.1 评估最佳影像学反应。
我们共纳入了 48 名 mRCC 患者:中位年龄 65 岁,75.0%为透明细胞组织学,68.8%为 IMDC 中危,中位接受了两次系统治疗。TKI-IO 联合方案包括纳武单抗-卡博替尼(N+C;24 例)、纳武单抗-帕唑帕尼(N+P;13 例)、纳武单抗-阿昔替尼(6 例)、纳武单抗-仑伐替尼(2 例)和纳武单抗-伊匹单抗-卡博替尼(3 例)。中位无进展生存期为 11.6 个月,中位总生存期尚未达到。45 例患者可获得缓解数据:完全缓解(CR;n=3,6.7%)、部分缓解(PR;20 例,44.4%)、疾病稳定(SD;19 例,42.2%)和疾病进展(3 例,6.7%)。总体缓解率为 51%,疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)为 93%。只有 1 例患者出现≥3 级不良事件。
据我们所知,这是首个报告 TKI-IO 联合方案治疗 mRCC 的非适应证使用的病例系列研究。TKI-IO 联合方案,特别是 N+P 和 N+C,具有良好的耐受性和疗效。尽管进一步的前瞻性研究至关重要,但 IO 或 TKI 单药治疗后疾病进展缓慢,可安全地通过添加 TKI 或 IO 来控制。