• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植后环磷酰胺改善患者报告结局:BMT CTN 1703的生活质量评估及2年结局

Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide: A Quality-of-Life Evaluation and 2-Year Outcomes of BMT CTN 1703.

作者信息

Holtan Shernan G, Bolaños-Meade Javier, Al Malki Monzr M, Wu Juan, Kitko Carrie L, Reshef Ran, Rezvani Andrew R, Shaffer Brian C, Solh Melhem M, Yao Janny M, Runaas Lyndsey, Elmariah Hany, Larkin Karilyn T, El Jurdi Najla, Gooptu Mahasweta, Loren Alison W, Hall Aric C, Alousi Amin M, Jamy Omer, Clark William, Kean Leslie, Bhatt Ami S, Perales Miguel-Angel, Applegate Kristy, Efebera Yvonne Adeduni, Leifer Eric, Jones Richard J, Horowitz Mary M, Mattila Deborah, Saber Wael, Hamadani Mehdi, Martens Michael J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

Bone Marrow Transplantation, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;43(8):912-918. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00921. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00921
PMID:39752608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124660/
Abstract

The BMT CTN 1703 phase III trial confirmed that graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) results in superior GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) compared with Tac/methotrexate (MTX) prophylaxis. This companion study assesses the effect of these regimens on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Using the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Score and PROMIS subscales (physical function, GI symptoms, social role satisfaction) as primary end points and hemorrhagic cystitis symptoms and Lee subscales as secondary end points, responses from English and Spanish speakers were analyzed at baseline and days 100, 180, and 365 after transplant. PRO scores were compared between the arms using inverse probability weighted-independent estimating equation models. The PTCy arm had significantly lower scores on the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale ( = .01), indicating lower GVHD symptom burden. Lee Scale nutrition and mouth subscores were also better in the PTCy arm compared with the Tac/MTX arm ( < .01 for both). Older participants (age >65 years) reported better Lee Scale psychological subscores than younger participants ( = .003). No significant differences were identified in hemorrhagic cystitis or in the PROMIS subscales between treatment arms. The updated clinical end points at 2 years for the parent trial confirmed that PTCy/Tac/MMF maintained a significant advantage over Tac/MTX in GRFS (42.4% 28.8%, = .001). In addition to improved GRFS, patients randomly assigned to the PTCy arm reported lower symptom burden during the first year after transplant.

摘要

BMT CTN 1703三期试验证实,与使用他克莫司(Tac)/甲氨蝶呤(MTX)进行移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防相比,采用移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)、他克莫司(Tac)和霉酚酸酯(MMF)进行GVHD预防可带来更优的无GVHD、无复发生存期(GRFS)。这项配套研究评估了这些方案对患者报告结局(PROs)的影响。以Lee慢性GVHD症状评分和PROMIS子量表(身体功能、胃肠道症状、社会角色满意度)作为主要终点,以出血性膀胱炎症状和Lee子量表作为次要终点,对英语和西班牙语使用者在基线以及移植后第100天、180天和365天的反应进行了分析。使用逆概率加权独立估计方程模型对各治疗组之间的PRO评分进行比较。PTCy组在Lee慢性GVHD症状量表上的得分显著更低(P = 0.01),表明GVHD症状负担更低。与Tac/MTX组相比,PTCy组在Lee量表的营养和口腔子评分方面也更好(两者均P < 0.01)。老年参与者(年龄>65岁)报告的Lee量表心理子评分优于年轻参与者(P = 0.003)。在治疗组之间,出血性膀胱炎或PROMIS子量表方面未发现显著差异。母试验2年时的更新临床终点证实,PTCy/Tac/MMF在GRFS方面相对于Tac/MTX仍保持显著优势(42.4%对28.8%,P = 0.001)。除了GRFS得到改善外,随机分配到PTCy组的患者在移植后第一年报告的症状负担更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/35ec9451add0/nihms-2073465-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/a5b0b4a07019/nihms-2073465-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/17444d0c7dbe/nihms-2073465-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/35ec9451add0/nihms-2073465-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/a5b0b4a07019/nihms-2073465-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/17444d0c7dbe/nihms-2073465-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/12124660/35ec9451add0/nihms-2073465-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide: A Quality-of-Life Evaluation and 2-Year Outcomes of BMT CTN 1703.移植后环磷酰胺改善患者报告结局:BMT CTN 1703的生活质量评估及2年结局
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;43(8):912-918. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00921. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Impact of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based GVHD Prophylaxis in Patients 70 years and Older: An Update from BMT CTN 1703.基于移植后环磷酰胺的移植物抗宿主病预防对70岁及以上患者的影响:BMT CTN 1703的最新情况
Blood Adv. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015964.
3
Treatment-Responsive Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Prophylaxis: Incidence and Clinical Outcomes.移植后环磷酰胺预防治疗后发生的治疗反应性急性移植物抗宿主病:发生率和临床结局。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jul;30(7):688.e1-688.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Mycophenolate Mofetil: A Friend or a Foe with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus Prophylaxis in HLA-Matched Donors?霉酚酸酯:与 HLA 匹配供体的移植后环磷酰胺和他克莫司预防一起是朋友还是敌人?
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Aug;28(8):500.e1-500.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.039. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study.肾移植中新型免疫抑制方案的临床疗效与成本效益:一项系统评价与模型研究
Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(21):1-179, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9210.
6
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.移植后环磷酰胺为基础的移植物抗宿主病预防。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2338-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215943.
7
Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Donor Stem Cell Transplantation: Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide Combinations Versus Methotrexate/Tacrolimus.异基因造血干细胞移植中的移植物抗宿主病预防:环磷酰胺联合方案与甲氨蝶呤/他克莫司。
Transplant Proc. 2024 Sep;56(7):1671-1677. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
8
Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.增殖性狼疮性肾炎的免疫抑制治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 29;6(6):CD002922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002922.pub4.
9
Intermediate-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for myeloablative HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation.移植后中等剂量环磷酰胺用于清髓性HLA单倍型相合骨髓移植
Blood Adv. 2025 May 27;9(10):2553-2569. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014879.
10
Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults.成人血液系统恶性肿瘤的骨髓与外周血异基因造血干细胞移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 7;11(11):CD010189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010189.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Stem-Cell Transplant Evaluation: A Single-Center Analysis.接受干细胞移植评估的患者的财务毒性和生活质量:一项单中心分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Mar;20(3):351-360. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00243. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
How old is too old? Frailty and geriatric assessments of older patients undergoing allogeneic HCT.多大年龄算太大?老年异基因造血干细胞移植患者的衰弱与老年评估。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):709-714. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000457.
3
Understanding the Needs and Lived Experiences of Patients With Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Real-World European Public Social Media Listening Study.
了解移植物抗宿主病患者的需求和生活经历:欧洲真实世界公共社交媒体倾听研究
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Nov 10;9:e42905. doi: 10.2196/42905.
4
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.移植后环磷酰胺为基础的移植物抗宿主病预防。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2338-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215943.
5
Decisional Regret in Long-Term Australian Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Survey.长期澳大利亚异基因造血干细胞移植幸存者的决策后悔:一项横断面调查。
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Nov;32(8):1134-1144. doi: 10.1177/10547738231180337. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
The Transplantation Ecosystem: A New Concept to Improve Access and Outcomes for Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients.移植生态系统:改善老年异体造血细胞移植患者获得机会和改善预后的新概念。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Oct;29(10):632.e1-632.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 May 1.
7
Health-Related Quality of Life in Double Umbilical Cord Blood versus Haploidentical Marrow Transplantation: A Quality of Life Analysis Report of BMT CTN 1101.双脐血与单倍体骨髓移植的健康相关生活质量:BMT CTN 1101 的生活质量分析报告。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):467.e1-467.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
8
A Pilot Trial of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Acute Graft-Versus-Host-Disease.患者报告的急性移植物抗宿主病结局的初步试验。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):465.e1-465.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.03.030. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
Health-related quality of life in reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation based on donor availability in patients aged 50-75 with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: BMT CTN 1102.50-75 岁伴中高危骨髓增生异常综合征患者基于供者情况的减轻强度异基因造血细胞移植的健康相关生活质量:BMT CTN 1102。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Feb;98(2):229-250. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26768. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
10
Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes with Clinical Organ Responses: Data from the Belumosudil Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Studies.患者报告结局与临床器官反应的相关性:来自贝鲁莫苏地尔慢性移植物抗宿主病研究的数据。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Oct;28(10):700.e1-700.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.06.020. Epub 2022 Jul 1.