Piazza Martin G, Thambireddy Swetha, Mandava Anisha, Abel Taylor J, Kellogg Robert G
Departments of1Neurosurgery and.
2Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2025 Jan 3;35(3):298-303. doi: 10.3171/2024.10.PEDS24228. Print 2025 Mar 1.
Intraventricular baclofen (IVB) administration is used for the treatment of secondary dystonia associated with cerebral palsy (CP), but it has not been reported as a first-line infusion technique for spasticity. In this study, the authors report outcomes of patients with mixed or isolated spasticity treated with IVB administration.
A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients treated with IVB between 2019 and 2023. Demographics, baseline clinical variables, and complications data were collected. The primary outcome of the study was the change in spasticity and dystonia as measured by the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores, respectively. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to compare the change in the pre- and postoperative scores.
Fifteen patients were implanted with IVB pumps for spasticity related to CP between 2019 and 2023. The median change in the MAS score was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1) and the median change in the BADS score was 1 (IQR = 2). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed a statistically significant change in both scores following IVB pump placement (BADS z = 2.90, p = 0.003; MAS z = 3.2, p = 0.001). Three patients (20%) experienced minor perioperative complications, all of which were self-limiting and none required additional surgery.
This study reported on 15 cases of mixed or isolated spasticity and showed a relative improvement in the MAS and BADS scores after IVB pump placement. These results provide evidence that IVB can be a safe and effective treatment for spasticity-related CP in addition to dystonia. IVB may be advantageous when an intraventricular route of baclofen administration is preferred.
脑室内注射巴氯芬(IVB)用于治疗与脑瘫(CP)相关的继发性肌张力障碍,但尚未作为治疗痉挛的一线输注技术报道。在本研究中,作者报告了接受IVB治疗的混合性或单纯性痉挛患者的治疗结果。
对2019年至2023年间连续接受IVB治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。收集人口统计学、基线临床变量和并发症数据。该研究的主要结果分别是通过改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和Barry-Albright肌张力障碍量表(BADS)评分衡量的痉挛和肌张力障碍的变化。进行Wilcoxon秩和检验以比较术前和术后评分的变化。
2019年至2023年间,15例患者因与CP相关的痉挛植入了IVB泵。MAS评分的中位数变化为2(四分位间距[IQR]=1),BADS评分的中位数变化为1(IQR=2)。Wilcoxon秩和检验显示,放置IVB泵后,两个评分均有统计学意义的变化(BADS z=2.90,p=0.003;MAS z=3.2,p=0.001)。3例患者(20%)出现轻微围手术期并发症,均为自限性,无一例需要额外手术。
本研究报告了15例混合性或单纯性痉挛病例,显示放置IVB泵后MAS和BADS评分相对改善。这些结果证明,除肌张力障碍外,IVB对于与痉挛相关的CP可能是一种安全有效的治疗方法。当首选巴氯芬的脑室内给药途径时,IVB可能具有优势。