Suppr超能文献

IMPACT-ICU可行性研究:针对危重症幸存者及其照护者的后续护理干预的实用混合方法随机对照试验。

IMPACT-ICU feasibility study: pragmatic mixed-methods randomised controlled trial of a follow-up care intervention for survivors of critical illness and caregivers.

作者信息

Jawa Natasha Arianne, Maslove David M, Sibley Stephanie, Muscedere John, Hunt Miranda, Hanley Michaela, Boyd Tracy, Westphal Robin, Mathur Sunita, Fakolade Afolasade, Tryon Michelle, Boyd John Gordon

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e086799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086799.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Survivors of critical illness and their caregivers are at risk for long-term cognitive, physical and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and PICS-family, respectively. This study will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up care bundle versus standard-of-care for ICU patients and their caregivers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre feasibility study. Survivors of critical illness will be eligible if: age ≥18 years, life expectancy ≥6 months and high risk for PICS. We define high risk as ICU stay ≥4 days or involving 1+ of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, delirium or lack of access to a primary care physician (PCP). 20 ICU survivor-primary caregiver dyads will be enrolled (n=10 dyads per group) and randomised 1:1 to the intervention versus control group. The intervention will be: (1) diaries to journal patient experiences, (2) information packages on expectations post-discharge and (3) specialised follow-up care at 1 and 3 months post-discharge. The control group will receive standard of care in the ICU and follow-up with their PCP. The primary outcome is feasibility, defined as: (1) consent rate >80%, (2) enrolment rate of 4 participants/month, (3) follow-up rate>70% and (4) data capture rate >80%. Our secondary objective is to explore the perspectives of survivors of critical illness and their families about the intervention and their participation in the study. Tertiary outcomes will be a battery of cognitive, physical functioning and psychiatric outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

Survivorship from critical illness extends beyond surviving an ICU stay. This project will lay the foundation for performing a large, multicentre pragmatic RCT with survivors of critical illness and their caregivers, paving the way for improved long-term healthcare.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has received approval (6039808) from the Queen's University Health Sciences/Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Results will be presented at critical care conferences. A lay summary co-designed with ICU survivor participants will be provided to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06681649.

摘要

引言

危重症幸存者及其照护者分别面临长期认知、身体和精神障碍的风险,即重症监护后综合征(PICS)和PICS-家庭版。本研究将评估一项随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验旨在比较重症监护病房(ICU)随访护理套餐与ICU患者及其照护者的标准治疗。

方法与分析

这是一项单中心可行性研究。危重症幸存者符合以下条件即为合格:年龄≥18岁,预期寿命≥6个月且患PICS风险高。我们将患PICS高风险定义为ICU住院时间≥4天或涉及机械通气、气管切开、谵妄或无法联系到初级保健医生(PCP)中的一项及以上情况。将招募20对ICU幸存者-主要照护者(每组10对),并按1:1随机分为干预组和对照组。干预措施包括:(1)用于记录患者经历的日记,(2)关于出院后期望的信息包,(3)出院后1个月和3个月的专门随访护理。对照组将接受ICU的标准治疗,并由其PCP进行随访。主要结局为可行性,定义为:(1)同意率>80%,(2)每月招募4名参与者,(3)随访率>70%,(4)数据捕获率>80%。我们的次要目标是探讨危重症幸存者及其家人对干预措施以及他们参与研究的看法。三级结局将是一系列认知、身体功能和精神方面的结局。

意义

危重症幸存者的生存不仅仅是在ICU住院期间存活下来。该项目将为对危重症幸存者及其照护者开展大规模、多中心实用RCT奠定基础,为改善长期医疗保健铺平道路。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得女王大学健康科学/附属教学医院研究伦理委员会批准(6039808)。研究结果将在重症监护会议上公布。将向患者提供与ICU幸存者参与者共同设计的通俗易懂的总结。

试验注册号

NCT06681649。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2996/11749798/7387bd73fcec/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验