Suppr超能文献

丁丙诺啡与完全激动剂阿片类药物用于急性术后疼痛管理:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Buprenorphine versus full agonist opioids for acute postoperative pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Hickey Thomas R, Costa Gabriel P A, Oliveira Debora, Podosek Alexandra, Abelleira Audrey, Avila-Quintero Victor Javier, De Aquino Joao P

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Anesthesiology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: Opioids continue to play a key role in managing acute postoperative pain, but their use contributes to adverse outcomes. Buprenorphine may offer effective analgesia with a superior safety profile.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine with other opioids for acute postoperative pain management in adults.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing buprenorphine with other opioids for acute postoperative pain management in adults were included. Of 2421 records identified, 58 studies met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Stata/BE V.18. The primary outcome was pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included rescue analgesia use, duration of analgesia, and adverse effects.

FINDINGS

Analysis of 41 comparisons (2587 participants) showed buprenorphine significantly reduced pain intensity compared with all other opioids (Hedges's g=-0.36, 95% CI=-0.59 to -0.14, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval (PI)=-1.70 to 0.97). This effect persisted when compared with full agonist opioid (FAO) alone (standardized mean difference -0.34, 95% CI=-0.59 to -0.10, p<0.001, 95% PI=-1.76 to 1.07). Patients receiving buprenorphine were less likely to require rescue analgesia (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.26 to 0.63, p<0.001, 95% PI=0.12 to 1.36). Mean duration of analgesia was 8.5 hours (SD 1.84). There were no significant differences in other adverse effects including nausea and respiratory depression. Inconsistency was significant for pain intensity (I=86.28%, 95% CI=81.55% to 88.99%) and moderate for rescue analgesia (I=38.93%, 95% CI=1.44% to 64.37%). Risk of bias was low in 19 studies, with some concerns in 37 studies, and high in two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine demonstrated superior efficacy in managing acute postoperative pain compared with FAOs, with a favorable safety profile and longer duration of action. These findings support the use of buprenorphine as a first-line opioid analgesic for acute postoperative pain management requiring opioid analgesia, potentially reducing opioid-related harm in the postoperative period.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023447715.

摘要

背景/重要性:阿片类药物在术后急性疼痛管理中仍发挥着关键作用,但其使用会导致不良后果。丁丙诺啡可能提供有效的镇痛作用,且安全性更佳。

目的

比较丁丙诺啡与其他阿片类药物用于成人术后急性疼痛管理的疗效和安全性。

证据综述

检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和Web of Science,检索时间从建库至2024年2月。纳入比较丁丙诺啡与其他阿片类药物用于成人术后急性疼痛管理的随机对照试验。在检索到的2421条记录中,58项研究符合纳入标准。两名研究者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用Stata/BE V.18进行随机效应荟萃分析。主要结局为疼痛强度。次要结局包括使用解救镇痛药、镇痛持续时间和不良反应。

研究结果

对41项比较(2587名参与者)的分析显示,与所有其他阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡显著降低了疼痛强度(Hedges's g=-0.36,95%置信区间=-0.59至-0.14,p<0.001,95%预测区间(PI)=-1.70至0.97)。与单独使用完全激动剂阿片类药物(FAO)相比,这一效果依然存在(标准化均数差-0.34,95%置信区间=-0.59至-0.10,p<0.001,95% PI=-1.76至1.OS)。接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者需要使用解救镇痛药的可能性较小(OR=0.40,95%置信区间=0.26至0.63,p<0.001,95% PI=0.12至1.36)。平均镇痛持续时间为8.5小时(标准差1.84)。在包括恶心和呼吸抑制在内的其他不良反应方面无显著差异。疼痛强度方面的异质性显著(I=86.28%,95%置信区间=81.55%至88.99%),解救镇痛药方面为中度异质性(I=38.93%,95%置信区间=1.44%至64.37%)。19项研究的偏倚风险较低,37项研究存在一些担忧,2项研究的偏倚风险较高。

结论

与FAO相比,丁丙诺啡在术后急性疼痛管理中显示出更好的疗效,安全性良好,作用持续时间更长。这些发现支持将丁丙诺啡用作需要阿片类镇痛的术后急性疼痛管理的一线阿片类镇痛药,可能会减少术后阿片类药物相关危害。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023447715。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验