• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用来自相同读数的核数据和叶绿体数据进行亚科进化分析。

Subfamily evolution analysis using nuclear and chloroplast data from the same reads.

作者信息

Witharana Eranga Pawani, Iwasaki Takaya, San Myat Htoo, Jayawardana Nadeeka U, Kotoda Nobuhiro, Yamamoto Masashi, Nagano Yukio

机构信息

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83292-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83292-9
PMID:39753617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698846/
Abstract

The chloroplast (cp) genome is a widely used tool for exploring plant evolutionary relationships, yet its effectiveness in fully resolving these relationships remains uncertain. Integrating cp genome data with nuclear DNA information offers a more comprehensive view but often requires separate datasets. In response, we employed the same raw read sequencing data to construct cp genome-based trees and nuclear DNA phylogenetic trees using Read2Tree, a cost-efficient method for extracting conserved nuclear gene sequences from raw read data, focusing on the Aurantioideae subfamily, which includes Citrus and its relatives. The resulting nuclear DNA trees were consistent with existing nuclear evolutionary relationships derived from high-throughput sequencing, but diverged from cp genome-based trees. To elucidate the underlying complex evolutionary processes causing these discordances, we implemented an integrative workflow that utilized multiple alignments of each gene generated by Read2Tree, in conjunction with other phylogenomic methods. Our analysis revealed that incomplete lineage sorting predominantly drives these discordances, while introgression and ancient introgression also contribute to topological discrepancies within certain clades. This study underscores the cost-effectiveness of using the same raw sequencing data for both cp and nuclear DNA analyses in understanding plant evolutionary relationships.

摘要

叶绿体(cp)基因组是探索植物进化关系的一种广泛使用的工具,但其在完全解析这些关系方面的有效性仍不确定。将cp基因组数据与核DNA信息相结合可以提供更全面的视角,但通常需要单独的数据集。为此,我们使用相同的原始读取测序数据,通过Read2Tree构建基于cp基因组的树和核DNA系统发育树,Read2Tree是一种从原始读取数据中提取保守核基因序列的经济高效的方法,重点关注包括柑橘及其近缘种在内的金橘亚科。由此产生的核DNA树与从高通量测序得出的现有核进化关系一致,但与基于cp基因组的树不同。为了阐明导致这些不一致的潜在复杂进化过程,我们实施了一种综合工作流程,该流程利用Read2Tree生成的每个基因的多序列比对,并结合其他系统发育基因组学方法。我们的分析表明,不完全谱系分选是导致这些不一致的主要原因,而基因渗入和古老基因渗入也导致了某些分支内的拓扑差异。这项研究强调了在理解植物进化关系时,使用相同的原始测序数据进行cp和核DNA分析的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/44c225c604e8/41598_2024_83292_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/1090fb9852d8/41598_2024_83292_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/6c925374efcf/41598_2024_83292_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/6c5ae2be1ece/41598_2024_83292_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/3b5cac4faafa/41598_2024_83292_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/44c225c604e8/41598_2024_83292_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/1090fb9852d8/41598_2024_83292_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/6c925374efcf/41598_2024_83292_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/6c5ae2be1ece/41598_2024_83292_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/3b5cac4faafa/41598_2024_83292_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f5/11698846/44c225c604e8/41598_2024_83292_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Subfamily evolution analysis using nuclear and chloroplast data from the same reads.使用来自相同读数的核数据和叶绿体数据进行亚科进化分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83292-9.
2
Extensive cytonuclear discordance revealed by phylogenomic analyses suggests complex evolutionary history in the holly genus Ilex (Aquifoliaceae).系统发育基因组分析揭示的广泛细胞核与细胞质不一致表明冬青属(冬青科)具有复杂的进化历史。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2025 Mar;204:108255. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108255. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
3
Chloroplast genomes of Rubiaceae: Comparative genomics and molecular phylogeny in subfamily Ixoroideae.茜草科叶绿体基因组:茜草亚科的比较基因组学和分子系统发育。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232295. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of the genus Citrus and its close relatives.柑橘属及其近缘种叶绿体基因组的比较分析。
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2017 Jan;28(1):33-36. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1106528. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
Genome-wide RAD sequencing resolves the evolutionary history of serrate leaf Juniperus and reveals discordance with chloroplast phylogeny.全基因组 RAD 测序解析锯齿叶崖柏的进化历史,并揭示与叶绿体系统发育的不一致性。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Mar;156:107022. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107022. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Next-generation technologies to determine plastid genome sequences.用于确定质体基因组序列的下一代技术。
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1132:39-46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-995-6_2.
7
Rumbling Orchids: How To Assess Divergent Evolution Between Chloroplast Endosymbionts and the Nuclear Host.轰鸣声兰花:如何评估叶绿体内共生体与核宿主之间的分歧进化。
Syst Biol. 2016 Jan;65(1):51-65. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv070. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids.基于完整叶绿体基因组序列的葡萄属(葡萄科)系统发育分析:分类群抽样和系统发育方法对解决蔷薇类植物间关系的影响
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Apr 9;6:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-32.
9
A Phylogenetic Analysis of 34 Chloroplast Genomes Elucidates the Relationships between Wild and Domestic Species within the Genus Citrus.对34个叶绿体基因组的系统发育分析阐明了柑橘属野生种和栽培种之间的关系。
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Aug;32(8):2015-35. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv082. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Phylogenomic analyses based on genome-skimming data reveal cyto-nuclear discordance in the evolutionary history of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae).基于基因组扫描数据的系统基因组学分析揭示了栒子属(蔷薇科)的细胞-核分歧的进化历史。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 May;158:107083. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107083. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of a woody invasive species, in Korea.韩国一种木本入侵物种完整叶绿体基因组的特征分析。
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2025 Jul 14;10(8):725-730. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2025.2529847. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Plastid phylogenomics and cytonuclear discordance in Rubioideae, Rubiaceae.质体系统发育基因组学和茜草科 Rubioideae 中的核质分歧。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0302365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302365. eCollection 2024.
2
Complete organelle genomes of Korean fir, Abies koreana and phylogenomics of the gymnosperm genus Abies using nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA sequence data.利用核和细胞质 DNA 序列数据解析韩国冷杉(Abies koreana)的完整细胞器基因组和松柏目冷杉属的系统发生基因组学。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):7636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58253-x.
3
Editorial: Phylogenomic discordance in plant systematics.
社论:植物系统学中的系统发育基因组不一致性。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 27;14:1308126. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1308126. eCollection 2023.
4
Phylogenomic cytonuclear discordance and evolutionary histories of plants and animals.动植物的系统发育基因组细胞核对和进化史
Sci China Life Sci. 2023 Dec;66(12):2946-2948. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2456-6. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Patterns of cytonuclear discordance and divergence between subspecies of the scarlet macaw (Ara macao) in Central America.中美洲猩红金刚鹦鹉亚种间的细胞核分歧和分化模式。
Genetica. 2023 Oct;151(4-5):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s10709-023-00193-x. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies.用于植物多样性研究的目标捕获和基因组浅层测序
Appl Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 10;11(4):e11537. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11537. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
7
Phylogenomic comparative methods: Accurate evolutionary inferences in the presence of gene tree discordance.系统发育基因组比较方法:在基因树分歧存在的情况下进行准确的进化推断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2220389120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220389120. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Inference of phylogenetic trees directly from raw sequencing reads using Read2Tree.使用 Read2Tree 从原始测序reads 直接推断系统发育树。
Nat Biotechnol. 2024 Jan;42(1):139-147. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01753-4. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
Deciphering complex reticulate evolution of Asian Buddleja (Scrophulariaceae): insights into the taxonomy and speciation of polyploid taxa in the Sino-Himalayan region.解析亚洲醉鱼草属(玄参科)的复杂网状进化:对横断山区多倍体分类群的分类和物种形成的认识。
Ann Bot. 2023 Oct 4;132(1):15-28. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad022.
10
Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genome: Structure, Phylogenetic Relationships of and Evolutionary Inference of Galegeae.叶绿体基因组全序列分析: 结构、 系统发育关系及蒺藜科的进化推断。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;14(1):176. doi: 10.3390/genes14010176.