Waikar Sushrut S, Mogg Robin, Baker Amanda F, Frendl Gyorgy, Topper Michael, Adler Scott, Sultana Stefan, Zhao Runqi, King Nicholas M P, Piccoli Steven P, Sauer John-Michael, Hoffmann Steve, Nunes Irene, Sistare Frank D
Department of Medicine and Section of Nephrology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 May;117(5):1272-1283. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3531. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
Two observational studies were conducted to support an initiative to qualify translational kidney safety biomarkers as clinical drug development tools that identify tubular injury prior to changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Normal healthy volunteers provided three morning spot urine collections over 4 weeks. Patients undergoing surgical resection and intrathoracic cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma provided urine samples pre- and postoperatively at 4, 8, and 12 hours and daily for 6 days. Using receiver-operating characteristics curves, "statistically significant thresholds" established peak longitudinal changes for 8 biomarkers to differentiate mesothelioma patients who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) from normal healthy volunteers. We also assessed "medically significant thresholds" to differentiate mesothelioma patients who did vs. did not develop AKI. Statistically and medically significant thresholds for a fold-change from baseline of urine creatinine (UCr)-normalized values were established for 6 biomarkers: clusterin (2.2, 5.1); osteopontin (3.1, 7.1); N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (2.7, 8.1); kidney injury molecule-1 (4.3, 7.5); cystatin C (1.8, 4.5); neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (2.9, 7.8). For urine albumin and total protein, thresholds were established based on UCr-normalized absolute values: (> upper limit normal, > 10× upper limit normal). Statistically significant thresholds for all biomarkers outperformed eGFR at discriminating mesothelioma subjects exposed to cisplatin from healthy volunteers, demonstrating their utility for enhancing safe drug development. Medically significant thresholds provide perspective on when patients begin to exhibit AKI. These studies have established guideposts for confirmatory studies with additional cohorts and nephrotoxicants to formally qualify the selected biomarkers with worldwide regulatory authorities.
开展了两项观察性研究,以支持一项将转化性肾脏安全生物标志物鉴定为临床药物开发工具的倡议,这些生物标志物可在估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)变化之前识别肾小管损伤。正常健康志愿者在4周内提供了3次晨尿样本。接受手术切除并胸腔内注射顺铂治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的患者在术前、术后4、8和12小时以及术后6天每天提供尿液样本。利用受试者工作特征曲线,“统计学显著阈值”确定了8种生物标志物的峰值纵向变化,以区分发生急性肾损伤(AKI)的间皮瘤患者与正常健康志愿者。我们还评估了“医学显著阈值”,以区分发生AKI和未发生AKI的间皮瘤患者。确定了6种生物标志物基于尿肌酐(UCr)标准化值相对于基线的倍数变化的统计学和医学显著阈值:簇集蛋白(2.2,5.1);骨桥蛋白(3.1,7.1);N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(2.7,8.1);肾损伤分子-1(4.3,7.5);胱抑素C(1.8,4.5);中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(2.9,7.8)。对于尿白蛋白和总蛋白,基于UCr标准化绝对值确定阈值:(>正常上限,>正常上限的倍)。在区分接触顺铂的间皮瘤受试者与健康志愿者方面,所有生物标志物的统计学显著阈值均优于eGFR,证明了它们在加强安全药物开发方面的效用。医学显著阈值为患者何时开始出现AKI提供了参考。这些研究为使用其他队列和肾毒性药物进行验证性研究建立了指导原则,以便与全球监管机构正式鉴定所选生物标志物。