Cho Hanseul, Jo Hyesu, Jeong Yi Deun, Jang Wonwoo, Park Jaeyu, Yim Yesol, Lee Kyeongmin, Lee Hayeon, Lee Sooji, Fond Guillaume, Boyer Laurent, Pizzol Damiano, Jung Junyang, Yon Dong Keon
Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Regulatory Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Mar 15;373:495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.102. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
Despite the increasing use of antipsychotics during pregnancy, comprehensive evaluations of their individual safety profiles using global data remain limited. This study aimed to assess the safety of various antipsychotics during pregnancy by comparing them to quetiapine, which has a relatively large body of safety data.
Utilizing the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (1968-2023; n = 131,255,418 reports), we identified 11,406 reports of antipsychotic exposure during pregnancy. A disproportionality analysis was performed to calculate reporting odds ratios (RORs) for adverse pregnancy, fetal, or neonatal outcomes associated with haloperidol, ziprasidone, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and paliperidone, compared to quetiapine.
Haloperidol had a significantly higher reporting frequency for congenital malformations compared to quetiapine (ROR 3.83; 95 % CI, 2.62-5.59). No statistically significant differences were found for other antipsychotics regarding congenital malformations or neonatal complications compared to quetiapine. All studied antipsychotics had lower reporting frequencies for gestational diabetes mellitus than quetiapine (overall ROR 0.22; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.28). Haloperidol, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole were more frequently reported for abortion or stillbirth. Paliperidone and ziprasidone had similar or lower reporting frequencies for major adverse outcomes compared to quetiapine, though conclusions regarding ziprasidone are limited by the small number of reports and the relatively high proportion mentioning adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Incomplete data and reporting bias hinder establishing causality.
Compared to quetiapine, several antipsychotics with less established safety data, particularly ziprasidone and paliperidone, have the potential to serve as safe alternatives for use during pregnancy. However, further research is needed to verify these findings and ensure the safety of these antipsychotics as treatment options during pregnancy.
尽管孕期抗精神病药物的使用日益增加,但利用全球数据对其个体安全性概况进行的全面评估仍然有限。本研究旨在通过将各种抗精神病药物与具有相对大量安全数据的喹硫平进行比较,评估其在孕期的安全性。
利用世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库(1968 - 2023年;n = 131,255,418份报告),我们识别出11,406份孕期抗精神病药物暴露报告。进行了不成比例分析,以计算与喹硫平相比,与氟哌啶醇、齐拉西酮、氯氮平、奥氮平、利培酮、阿立哌唑和帕利哌酮相关的不良妊娠、胎儿或新生儿结局的报告比值比(ROR)。
与喹硫平相比,氟哌啶醇先天性畸形的报告频率显著更高(ROR 3.83;95% CI,2.62 - 5.59)。与喹硫平相比,其他抗精神病药物在先天性畸形或新生儿并发症方面未发现统计学显著差异。所有研究的抗精神病药物妊娠糖尿病的报告频率均低于喹硫平(总体ROR 0.22;95% CI,0.18 - 0.28)。氟哌啶醇、氯氮平、奥氮平、利培酮和阿立哌唑流产或死产的报告更为频繁。与喹硫平相比,帕利哌酮和齐拉西酮主要不良结局的报告频率相似或更低,不过关于齐拉西酮的结论因报告数量少和提及不良妊娠结局的比例相对较高而受到限制。
数据不完整和报告偏倚阻碍了因果关系的确立。
与喹硫平相比,一些安全性数据较少的抗精神病药物,特别是齐拉西酮和帕利哌酮,有可能作为孕期使用的安全替代品。然而,需要进一步研究来验证这些发现,并确保这些抗精神病药物作为孕期治疗选择的安全性。