Wang Xiaoli, Zhao Xingru, Cen Tianqi, Yu Yi, Xu Zhiwei, Shen Lijun, Wang Ziqi, Jones Paul, Zhang Quncheng, An Yunxia, Zhang Xiaoju
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85010-x.
China has implemented the "tiered medical services" policy since 2015, while there is a paucity of data evaluating the the current status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management under the system. Characteristics and treatments from 11,905 COPD patients in 88 hospitals across different tiers in China were included and analyzed. We assessed the statistical significance of differences by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and with the chi-squared test for categorical variables. Patients in primary hospitals (Tier1) exhibited heightened exposure to risk factors including smoking, household biofuel, and family history of respiratory diseases, and displayed elevated COPD assessment test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale scores, and worse lung function, in comparison to tertiary (Tier3) hospitals (P < 0.001). However, the utilization of inhaled maintenance treatments in Tier1 hospitals is markedly lower than that in Tier3 hospitals (54.8% vs. 81.3%, P < 0.001). At odds with the patients with more severer symptoms (as indicated by CAT ≥ 10 or mMRC ≥ 2), a higher proportion relied exclusively on single bronchodilators in Tier1 hospitals was observed compared to secondary (Tier2) and Tier3 hospitals (37.7% vs. 32.1% vs. 26.3%, 40.0% vs. 29.8% vs. 25.6%, P<0.001). Dual bronchodilators (long-acting β2-agonists /long-acting muscarinic antagonist, LABA/LAMA) represented the least common medication regimen across all tiers of hospitals, albeit their usage rates increased in tandem with hospital tier (0.7% vs. 7.2% vs. 10.4%, P < 0.001). In addition, the use of inhalation therapies containing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in China's primary care is notably lower (16.9%) than the United States, the United Kingdom, and other middle-to-high-income countries (29.5-57.0%). There was compelling evidence pointing to greater disease severity in Tier1 hospitals, attributable to the lower and inappropriate utilization of inhaled maintenance treatments. This underscores the necessity for enhanced availability of medications and educational initiatives aimed at both physicians and patients within Tier1 hospitals.
自2015年以来中国实施了“分级医疗服务”政策,然而缺少对该体系下慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)管理现状进行评估的数据。纳入并分析了中国不同级别88家医院11905例COPD患者的特征及治疗情况。对连续变量采用方差分析(ANOVA)评估差异的统计学意义,对分类变量采用卡方检验进行评估。与三级医院(Tier3)相比,基层医院(Tier1)的患者暴露于包括吸烟、家用生物燃料和呼吸系统疾病家族史等风险因素的情况更多,慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)和改良英国医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表评分更高,肺功能更差(P < 0.001)。然而,Tier1医院吸入维持治疗的使用率显著低于Tier3医院(54.8% 对81.3%,P < 0.001)。与症状更严重的患者(以CAT≥10或mMRC≥2表示)的情况相反,与二级医院(Tier2)和Tier3医院相比,Tier1医院中仅依赖单一支气管扩张剂的患者比例更高(37.7%对32.1%对26.3%,40.0%对29.8%对25.6%,P < 0.001)。双支气管扩张剂(长效β2受体激动剂/长效抗毒蕈碱药,LABA/LAMA)在所有级别的医院中都是最不常用的药物治疗方案,尽管其使用率随医院级别升高而增加(0.7%对7.2%对10.4%,P < 0.001)。此外,中国基层医疗中含吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的吸入疗法使用率(16.9%)明显低于美国、英国和其他中高收入国家(29.5% - 57.0%)。有确凿证据表明Tier1医院的疾病严重程度更高,这归因于吸入维持治疗的用量较低及使用不当。这凸显了提高Tier1医院药物供应以及针对医生和患者开展教育活动的必要性。