• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧卧位折刀位用于腹腔镜右后叶肝肿瘤切除术:一种安全有效的方法。

Left-lateral decubitus jackknife position for laparoscopic resection of right posterior liver tumors: A safe and effective approach.

作者信息

Kong Xiaohan, Niu Zheyu, Wang Heng, Liu Meng, Ma Chaoqun, Lu Jun, Zhou Xu, Zhu Huaqiang

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.

Department of Clinical Research, Qilu Synva Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Dezhou, China.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 4;410(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03595-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03595-3
PMID:39755910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11700036/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of LLR in VI/VII of the liver in Left-lateral Decubitus Jackknife Position (LDJP) and traditional Supine Position (SP). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to analyze clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS & METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing LLR for liver tumors in segments VI and/or VII at Shandong Provincial Hospital from 2018 to 2023. A total of 218 cases were included (LDJP, n = 94; SP, n = 124). Matched 1:1 PSM groups were created and clinical indicators compared between groups.

RESULTS

218 LLR patients, 94 LDJP and 124 supine. After 1:1 PSM, each group had 62 patients. No significant differences in clinical or laboratory parameters. All surgeries were successful, 1 LDJP conversion to open resection and 4 SP conversions (P = 0.375). LDJP average surgery duration: 220.6 ± 29.9 min, supine position: 262.6 ± 35.6 min (P < 0.001). LDJP perioperative blood loss: 169.0 ± 74.4 mL, supine position: 231.6 ± 84.6 mL (P < 0.001). Four LDJP patients required intraoperative blood transfusion compared to 16 supine position patients (P = 0.012). All cases had negative margins postoperatively. No significant differences in postoperative complications (8 LDJP vs 9 supine, P = 0.675) or length of hospital stay (25 LDJP vs 26 supine, ≥ 7 days) (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy in LDJP for hepatic VI/VII tumor safe and feasible. Reduces operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, improving outcomes.

摘要

目的

比较左侧卧位折刀位(LDJP)与传统仰卧位(SP)下肝Ⅵ/Ⅶ段腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的手术效果。我们采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)分析临床结局。

患者与方法

本研究回顾性分析了2018年至2023年在山东省立医院接受肝Ⅵ和/或Ⅶ段肝肿瘤LLR的患者。共纳入218例患者(LDJP组,n = 94;SP组,n = 124)。创建1:1匹配的PSM组,并比较两组之间的临床指标。

结果

218例LLR患者,94例采用LDJP,124例采用仰卧位。1:1 PSM后,每组各有62例患者。临床或实验室参数无显著差异。所有手术均成功,1例LDJP转为开腹切除,4例SP转为开腹切除(P = 0.375)。LDJP平均手术时间:220.6±29.9分钟,仰卧位:262.6±35.6分钟(P < 0.001)。LDJP围手术期失血量:169.0±74.4毫升,仰卧位:231.6±84.6毫升(P < 0.001)。4例LDJP患者术中需要输血,而仰卧位患者有16例(P = 0.012)。所有病例术后切缘均为阴性。术后并发症(LDJP组8例 vs SP组9例,P = 0.675)或住院时间(LDJP组25例 vs SP组26例,≥7天)(P = 1.000)无显著差异。

结论

LDJP下肝Ⅵ/Ⅶ段肿瘤的腹腔镜肝部分切除术安全可行。可减少手术时间、失血量和输血需求,改善手术效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/11700036/8524b0cac23e/423_2024_3595_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/11700036/6754bc9b82fd/423_2024_3595_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/11700036/8524b0cac23e/423_2024_3595_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/11700036/6754bc9b82fd/423_2024_3595_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d008/11700036/8524b0cac23e/423_2024_3595_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Left-lateral decubitus jackknife position for laparoscopic resection of right posterior liver tumors: A safe and effective approach.左侧卧位折刀位用于腹腔镜右后叶肝肿瘤切除术:一种安全有效的方法。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 4;410(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03595-3.
2
Laparoscopic liver resection in the semiprone position for tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments, using a novel dual-handling technique and bipolar irrigation system.采用新型双手操作技术和双极冲洗系统,在半俯卧位下行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝前上段和后段肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2484-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3469-y. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using the Lateral Approach from Intercostal Ports in Segments VI, VII, and VIII.腹腔镜肝切除术经肋间入路在第六、七、八段。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2135-2143. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3516-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Outcomes after laparoscopic or open liver resection for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.腹腔镜或开腹肝切除治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3887-3904. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10937-1. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 436 例经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4023-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Left jackknife position: a novel position for laparoscopic hepatectomy.左侧折刀位:一种用于腹腔镜肝切除术的新体位。
Chin J Cancer. 2017 Mar 20;36(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0190-y.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗良性肿瘤和病变:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1518-1525. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0427. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Robotic-assisted right posterior segmentectomies for liver lesions: single-center experience of an evolutional method in left semi-lateral position.机器人辅助右后段肝切除术治疗肝脏病变:左侧半卧位改良术式的单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0842-1. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
9
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的多中心倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):658-666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06812-z. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.采用腹腔trocar 经仰卧位行肝后上叶肿瘤微创切除术
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):536-543. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06789-9. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study.肿瘤大小对腹腔镜下肝切除术难度的影响:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6628-6636. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13863-z. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Safely Modified Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Segment VI and/or VII Hepatic Lesions Using the Left Lateral Decubitus Position.采用左侧卧位安全改良腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝Ⅵ段和/或Ⅶ段病变
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Aug 20;15:6691-6699. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S376919. eCollection 2022.
3
Benign liver tumours: understanding molecular physiology to adapt clinical management.
良性肝肿瘤:了解分子生理学以适应临床管理。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;19(11):703-716. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00643-5. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
Advances in the surgical treatment of liver cancer.肝癌的外科治疗进展。
Biosci Trends. 2022 Jul 20;16(3):178-188. doi: 10.5582/bst.2022.01245. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Procedure: Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.手术步骤:腹腔镜供肾切除术。
J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(S2):S75-S82. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0227.
6
Epigenetics in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌中的表观遗传学。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Nov;86(Pt 3):622-632. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.017. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
7
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for tumors located in right posterior segment: A single institution study.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗右后段肿瘤的单中心研究
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
A laparoscopic vascular blocking forceps used for renal carcinoma combined with tumor thrombus.一种用于肾癌合并肿瘤血栓的腹腔镜血管阻断钳。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):678-679. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0063.
9
Benign Liver Tumors.良性肝脏肿瘤
Visc Med. 2020 Aug;36(4):292-303. doi: 10.1159/000509145. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches.肝癌的挑战与可能的治疗方法。
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020 Jan;1873(1):188314. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188314. Epub 2019 Nov 1.