• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助右后段肝切除术治疗肝脏病变:左侧半卧位改良术式的单中心经验

Robotic-assisted right posterior segmentectomies for liver lesions: single-center experience of an evolutional method in left semi-lateral position.

作者信息

Wu Chao-Ying, Chen Po-Da, Lee Chih-Yuan, Liang Jin-Tung, Wu Yao-Ming

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0842-1. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-018-0842-1
PMID:29995223
Abstract

Despite the popularity of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hepatectomy, limitations in the approach of the right posterior section of the liver remain. Although skills and approach techniques have been developed for hepatectomy of lesions in the posterior segments of the liver, most are performed laparoscopically and are limited to few experienced hands using rigid laparoscopic instruments. In this study, we tried a different approach area via the aid of a flexible robotic system. Since 2012, we have successfully completed more than 200 robotic hepatectomy procedures in our institution. Two different patient settings have been applied for right posterior segment lesions, including supine position as general setting in early cases and left semi-lateral decubitus setting in our later cases. The demographic data and perioperative outcomes between the two groups were analyzed in regard to different positioning. A total of 25 patients with right posterior segment lesions underwent robotic-assisted resection, 13 were placed in supine position and 12 in left semi-lateral position. The left semi-lateral group had significantly shorter operation time (306.0 versus 416.8 min, p = 0.023), less blood loss (203.9 versus 1092.3 mL, p = 0.030), and lower transfusion rates (0 versus 46.2%, p = 0.015). We described an evolutionary technique for robotic right posterior segmentectomies with the patient placed in left semi-lateral position. This method can be applied for most patients easily and is demonstrated as a safe and feasible approach in selected patients owing to its ability to overcome the difficulty of MIS hepatectomy for right posterior lesions.

摘要

尽管微创肝切除术很受欢迎,但肝脏右后叶的手术入路仍存在局限性。虽然已经开发出了针对肝后段病变肝切除术的技术和入路方法,但大多数是通过腹腔镜进行的,并且仅限于少数使用刚性腹腔镜器械的有经验的医生。在本研究中,我们借助柔性机器人系统尝试了不同的入路区域。自2012年以来,我们在本机构已成功完成了200多例机器人肝切除手术。对于右后段病变采用了两种不同的患者体位设置,早期病例的一般体位为仰卧位,后期病例为左侧半卧位。针对不同体位对两组患者的人口统计学数据和围手术期结果进行了分析。共有25例右后段病变患者接受了机器人辅助切除术,13例采用仰卧位,12例采用左侧半卧位。左侧半卧位组的手术时间明显更短(306.0分钟对416.8分钟,p = 0.023),失血量更少(203.9毫升对1092.3毫升,p = 0.030),输血率更低(0对46.2%,p = 0.015)。我们描述了一种将患者置于左侧半卧位的机器人右后段切除术的改进技术。该方法可轻松应用于大多数患者,并且由于其能够克服右后段病变微创肝切除术的困难,在选定患者中被证明是一种安全可行的方法。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted right posterior segmentectomies for liver lesions: single-center experience of an evolutional method in left semi-lateral position.机器人辅助右后段肝切除术治疗肝脏病变:左侧半卧位改良术式的单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0842-1. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute.肝胆胰机器人手术:单中心机构的初步经验
J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
3
Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach.机器人活体供肝右半肝切除术:一种纯粹的微创方法。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Nov;22(11):1509-1518. doi: 10.1002/lt.24522.
4
Robotic Liver Surgery: Early Experience From a Single Surgical Center.机器人肝脏手术:来自单一手术中心的早期经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Feb;26(1):66-71. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000227.
5
Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars.采用腹腔trocar 经仰卧位行肝后上叶肿瘤微创切除术
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):536-543. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06789-9. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Technique of robotic left hepatectomy : how we approach it.机器人辅助左半肝切除术技术:我们的手术方法
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):201-207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0890-6. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Total abdominal approach for postero-superior segments (7, 8) in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentric experience.腹腔镜肝手术中后上肝段(7、8段)的全腹入路:多中心经验
Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0305-4. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Technical approach of robotic total right hepatic lobectomy: How we do it?机器人辅助右半肝切除术的技术方法:我们是如何开展的?
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):193-199. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0881-7. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre.腹腔镜与机器人肝切除术:单中心经验
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Mar;86(3):122-6. doi: 10.1111/ans.13339. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy.机器人与腹腔镜左外叶切除术治疗复杂病例。
Int J Surg. 2019 Jul;67:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver resection in stage 0-A HCC in segments 7/8: a propensity-matched analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach.7/8段0-A期肝癌的肝切除术:一项比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术入路的倾向匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1902-1914. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11521-3. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Three-Device (3D) Technique for Liver Parenchyma Dissection in Robotic Liver Surgery.机器人肝脏手术中肝实质离断的三器械(3D)技术
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5265. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225265.
3
International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach.机器人活体供肝右半肝切除术:一种纯粹的微创方法。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Nov;22(11):1509-1518. doi: 10.1002/lt.24522.
2
Robotic liver resection for malignancy: Current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications.用于恶性肿瘤的机器人肝脏切除术:现状、肿瘤学结局、与腹腔镜手术的比较及未来应用
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;112(3):295-301. doi: 10.1002/jso.23901. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms.
2018 年机器人肝切除术国际共识声明。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 28;25(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432.
4
Comparison between robotic and open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性肝切除术的比较:短期结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00629-0. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
机器人辅助肝切除术的系统评价及机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝脏肿瘤的Meta分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):862-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4306-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
4
Robotic liver surgery.机器人肝脏手术。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014 Oct;3(5):288-94. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.09.02.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术:来自单一中心的比较研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec;399(8):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1238-y. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study.传统与机器人辅助全腹腔镜肝切除术:一项配对比较研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Nov;38(11):2904-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2679-8.
7
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection.机器人辅助微创肝切除术
Asian J Surg. 2014 Apr;37(2):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
8
Laparoscopic liver resection in the semiprone position for tumors in the anterosuperior and posterior segments, using a novel dual-handling technique and bipolar irrigation system.采用新型双手操作技术和双极冲洗系统,在半俯卧位下行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝前上段和后段肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2484-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3469-y. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术的比较:一项匹配对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):549-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250.
10
Caudal approach to pure laparoscopic posterior sectionectomy under the laparoscopy-specific view.腹腔镜特定视野下单纯腹腔镜后下段切除术的经尾入路法。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jun 27;5(6):173-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.173.