Wei Zhen, Xu Hang, Zhong Weiquan, Wang Lin
The Second Clinical Medical School, Xuzhou Medical University, Tongshan Rd. 209, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu Province, China.
School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Tongshan Rd. 209, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu Province, China.
J Biomech. 2025 Feb;180:112494. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112494. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
This study aims to compare shank, rearfoot and forefoot coordination and its variability between runners with habitual rearfoot strike (RFS) and non-RFS (NRFS). 58 healthy males participated in this study (32 RFS, 26 NRFS). Coordination patterns and variability were assessed for the shank, rearfoot, and forefoot segments using a modified vector coding technique during running. RFS runners exhibited significantly greater proportion of anti-phase with distal dominancy (rearfoot) during early and mid-stance, as well as a lower proportion of anti-phase with proximal dominancy (shank) during early stance compared to NRFS runners in frontal rearfoot - transverse shank (FRTS). Conversely, NRFS runners demonstrated significantly greater proportion of anti-phase with distal dominance (forefoot) in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes during early stance compared to RFS runners. Coordination variabilities for the FRTS (late stance), frontal rearfoot - frontal forefoot (FRFF) (early and late stance), and frontal rearfoot - transverse forefoot (FRTF) (mid stance) were greater in NRFS than in RFS runners. In contrast, coordination variability for frontal rearfoot - sagittal forefoot (FRSF) (early stance) was greater in RFS than in NRFS runners. The results could further extend the relationship between foot strike pattern and injuries from the perspective of coordination and its variability. Preliminary findings suggest that NRFS runners could benefit from intrinsic foot muscle training to mitigate the sustained loads on the soft tissues of the foot.
本研究旨在比较习惯性后足着地(RFS)和非后足着地(NRFS)跑步者的小腿、后足和前足协调性及其变异性。58名健康男性参与了本研究(32名RFS,26名NRFS)。在跑步过程中,使用改良的矢量编码技术评估小腿、后足和前足节段的协调模式和变异性。与NRFS跑步者相比,RFS跑步者在支撑前期和中期表现出显著更高比例的远端主导(后足)反相位,以及在支撑前期额状面后足 - 矢状面小腿(FRTS)中近端主导(小腿)反相位的比例更低。相反,与RFS跑步者相比,NRFS跑步者在支撑前期矢状面、额状面和横断面上表现出显著更高比例的远端主导(前足)反相位。NRFS跑步者在FRTS(支撑后期)、额状面后足 - 额状面前足(FRFF)(支撑前期和后期)以及额状面后足 - 横断面前足(FRTF)(支撑中期)的协调变异性大于RFS跑步者。相比之下,RFS跑步者在额状面后足 - 矢状面前足(FRSF)(支撑前期)的协调变异性大于NRFS跑步者。这些结果可以从协调性及其变异性的角度进一步扩展着地模式与损伤之间的关系。初步研究结果表明,NRFS跑步者可能从足部固有肌肉训练中受益,以减轻足部软组织承受的持续负荷。