• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.护士日常伦理中的关怀与正义推理。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1177/09697330241312379. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Nurses' adherence to ethical principles - A qualitative study.护士对伦理原则的遵循——一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Oct 22:9697330241291159. doi: 10.1177/09697330241291159.
5
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
8
Impact of moral resilience and interprofessional collaboration on nurses' ethical competence.道德复原力和跨专业协作对护士伦理能力的影响。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Sep 30:9697330241277993. doi: 10.1177/09697330241277993.
9
Ethical issues after the earthquake in Turkey: A qualitative study on nurses' perspectives.土耳其地震后的伦理问题:一项关于护士观点的定性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e13048. doi: 10.1111/inr.13048. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
10
'Unable to dodge the bullet': a qualitative study of ethical dilemmas and moral distress of critical care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic in a South African Province.“无法躲避子弹”:对南非某省新冠疫情期间重症监护护士面临的伦理困境和道德困扰的质性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03405-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Moral conflicts from the justice and care perspectives of japanese nurses: a qualitative content analysis.从日本护士的正义和关怀视角看道德冲突:定性内容分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 4;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00960-7.
2
Ethical problems in nursing management - a cross-sectional survey about solving problems.护理管理中的伦理问题 - 解决问题的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4245-4.
3
Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review.护士在伦理困境方面的体验:综述
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):258-272. doi: 10.1177/0969733019832941. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review.护理伦理困境:综合述评。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3446-3461. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14542. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Nurses' contributions to the resolution of ethical dilemmas in practice.护士在实践中解决伦理困境的贡献。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Mar;25(2):230-242. doi: 10.1177/0969733017703700. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Lost in transformation? Reviving ethics of care in hospital cultures of evidence-based healthcare.迷失在转型之中?在循证医疗的医院文化中重振关怀伦理。
Nurs Inq. 2017 Jul;24(3). doi: 10.1111/nin.12187. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
How professional nurses working in hospital environments experience moral distress: a systematic review.在医院环境中工作的专业护士如何体验道德困扰:一项系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(28):1234-1291. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907280-00001.
8
Solving work-related ethical problems.解决与工作相关的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Dec;23(8):838-850. doi: 10.1177/0969733015584966. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Ethical concerns and dilemmas of Finnish and Dutch health professionals.芬兰和荷兰医疗专业人员的伦理问题与困境
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Sep;23(6):659-73. doi: 10.1177/0969733015579311. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
Care-based ethical reasoning among first-year nursing and social services students.护理和社会服务专业一年级学生的关爱伦理推理。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Feb;67(2):418-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05461.x. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

护士日常伦理中的关怀与正义推理。

Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.

作者信息

Juujärvi Soile, Tetri Birgitta

机构信息

Laurea University of Applied Sciences.

University of Helsinki.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1177/09697330241312379. Epub 2025 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1177/09697330241312379
PMID:39757412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391610/
Abstract

The ethics of care and justice represent two modes of moral reasoning that nurses use in solving real-life ethical dilemmas. The present study investigated what types of dilemmas nurses encounter in everyday work and to what extent they use care versus justice reasoning to solve them. The study used a cross-sectional survey design. Participants reported a real-life ethical dilemma and its resolution through an online survey. Open-ended data were analysed with an adjusted taxonomy of real-life moral dilemmas and moral orientations. Quantified data were analysed with statistical methods (χ-test, analysis of variance). Participants were 334 registered nurses and 177 practical nurses from four health and social care organisations in Finland. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Nurses reported six types of ethical dilemmas. Nurses used more care reasoning on the needs of others and conflicting demands dilemmas than on applying rules, social pressure and reacting to transgression dilemmas. Applying rules and needs of others dilemmas were the most common types of ethical dilemmas in both occupations. Practical nurses reported more non-ethical dilemmas than registered nurses did. Ethical dilemmas of nurses are diverse, and the use of care and justice reasoning is differentiated according to the type of dilemma. Care reasoning dominates nurses' ethical decision-making when responding to the needs of patients. Nurses use justice reasoning when they apply regimens, rules and procedures. In everyday ethics, care and justice reasoning complement each other. Highly regulated healthcare environments prefer rule-oriented justice reasoning that may supersede care reasoning in addressing patients' situations. Focus on technical-professional expertise may further hamper nurses' ethical decision-making. Nursing education and management should encourage nurses to use ethical concepts and values in their work.

摘要

关怀伦理和正义伦理代表了护士在解决现实生活中的伦理困境时所采用的两种道德推理模式。本研究调查了护士在日常工作中遇到的困境类型,以及他们在解决这些困境时运用关怀推理与正义推理的程度。该研究采用了横断面调查设计。参与者通过在线调查报告了一个现实生活中的伦理困境及其解决方案。对开放式数据采用了经过调整的现实生活道德困境和道德取向分类法进行分析。对量化数据采用统计方法(χ检验、方差分析)进行分析。参与者为来自芬兰四个卫生和社会护理机构的334名注册护士和177名实习护士。该研究获得了芬兰健康与福利研究所研究伦理委员会的批准。护士们报告了六种伦理困境类型。在处理他人需求和相互冲突的要求困境时,护士运用关怀推理的情况多于应用规则、社会压力和对违规行为做出反应的困境。在这两种职业中,应用规则和他人需求困境是最常见的伦理困境类型。实习护士报告的非伦理困境比注册护士更多。护士面临的伦理困境多种多样,并根据困境类型对关怀推理和正义推理的运用有所区分。在回应患者需求时,关怀推理在护士的伦理决策中占主导地位。护士在应用治疗方案、规则和程序时运用正义推理。在日常伦理中,关怀推理和正义推理相辅相成。高度规范化的医疗环境更倾向于以规则为导向的正义推理,在处理患者情况时可能会取代关怀推理。对技术专业知识的关注可能会进一步阻碍护士的伦理决策。护理教育和管理应鼓励护士在工作中运用伦理概念和价值观。