Juujärvi Soile, Tetri Birgitta
Laurea University of Applied Sciences.
University of Helsinki.
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1177/09697330241312379. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
The ethics of care and justice represent two modes of moral reasoning that nurses use in solving real-life ethical dilemmas. The present study investigated what types of dilemmas nurses encounter in everyday work and to what extent they use care versus justice reasoning to solve them. The study used a cross-sectional survey design. Participants reported a real-life ethical dilemma and its resolution through an online survey. Open-ended data were analysed with an adjusted taxonomy of real-life moral dilemmas and moral orientations. Quantified data were analysed with statistical methods (χ-test, analysis of variance). Participants were 334 registered nurses and 177 practical nurses from four health and social care organisations in Finland. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Nurses reported six types of ethical dilemmas. Nurses used more care reasoning on the needs of others and conflicting demands dilemmas than on applying rules, social pressure and reacting to transgression dilemmas. Applying rules and needs of others dilemmas were the most common types of ethical dilemmas in both occupations. Practical nurses reported more non-ethical dilemmas than registered nurses did. Ethical dilemmas of nurses are diverse, and the use of care and justice reasoning is differentiated according to the type of dilemma. Care reasoning dominates nurses' ethical decision-making when responding to the needs of patients. Nurses use justice reasoning when they apply regimens, rules and procedures. In everyday ethics, care and justice reasoning complement each other. Highly regulated healthcare environments prefer rule-oriented justice reasoning that may supersede care reasoning in addressing patients' situations. Focus on technical-professional expertise may further hamper nurses' ethical decision-making. Nursing education and management should encourage nurses to use ethical concepts and values in their work.
关怀伦理和正义伦理代表了护士在解决现实生活中的伦理困境时所采用的两种道德推理模式。本研究调查了护士在日常工作中遇到的困境类型,以及他们在解决这些困境时运用关怀推理与正义推理的程度。该研究采用了横断面调查设计。参与者通过在线调查报告了一个现实生活中的伦理困境及其解决方案。对开放式数据采用了经过调整的现实生活道德困境和道德取向分类法进行分析。对量化数据采用统计方法(χ检验、方差分析)进行分析。参与者为来自芬兰四个卫生和社会护理机构的334名注册护士和177名实习护士。该研究获得了芬兰健康与福利研究所研究伦理委员会的批准。护士们报告了六种伦理困境类型。在处理他人需求和相互冲突的要求困境时,护士运用关怀推理的情况多于应用规则、社会压力和对违规行为做出反应的困境。在这两种职业中,应用规则和他人需求困境是最常见的伦理困境类型。实习护士报告的非伦理困境比注册护士更多。护士面临的伦理困境多种多样,并根据困境类型对关怀推理和正义推理的运用有所区分。在回应患者需求时,关怀推理在护士的伦理决策中占主导地位。护士在应用治疗方案、规则和程序时运用正义推理。在日常伦理中,关怀推理和正义推理相辅相成。高度规范化的医疗环境更倾向于以规则为导向的正义推理,在处理患者情况时可能会取代关怀推理。对技术专业知识的关注可能会进一步阻碍护士的伦理决策。护理教育和管理应鼓励护士在工作中运用伦理概念和价值观。