Suppr超能文献

关于使用转录组学生物标志物预测遗传毒性的国际遗传毒性测试研讨会的共识结果。

Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity.

作者信息

Froetschl Roland, Corton J Christopher, Li Henghong, Aubrecht Jiri, Auerbach Scott S, Caiment Florian, Doktorova Tatyana Y, Fujita Yurika, Jennen Danyel, Koyama Naoki, Meier Matthew J, Mezencev Roman, Recio Leslie, Suzuki Takayoshi, Yauk Carole L

机构信息

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.

Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025 Jan 5. doi: 10.1002/em.22645.

Abstract

Gene expression biomarkers have the potential to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, providing opportunities for integrated testing and reducing animal use. In August 2022, an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) workshop was held to critically review current methods to identify genotoxicants using transcriptomic profiling. Here, we summarize the findings of the workgroup on the state of the science regarding the use of transcriptomic biomarkers to identify genotoxic chemicals in vitro and in vivo. A total of 1341 papers were examined to identify the biomarkers that show the most promise for identifying genotoxicants. This analysis revealed two independently derived in vivo biomarkers and three in vitro biomarkers that, when used in conjunction with standard computational techniques, can identify genotoxic chemicals in vivo (rat or mouse liver) or in human cells in culture using different gene expression profiling platforms, with predictive accuracies of ≥92%. These biomarkers have been validated to differing degrees but typically show high reproducibility across transcriptomic platforms and model systems. They offer several advantages for applications in different contexts of use in genotoxicity testing including: early signal detection, moderate-to-high-throughput screening capacity, adaptability to different cell types and tissues, and insights on mechanistic information on DNA-damage response. Workshop participants agreed on consensus statements to advance the regulatory adoption of transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity. The participants agreed that transcriptomic biomarkers have the potential to be used in conjunction with other biomarkers in integrated test strategies in vitro and using short-term rodent exposures to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals that may cause cancer and heritable genetic effects. Following are the consensus statements from the workgroup. Transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity can be used in Weight of Evidence (WoE) evaluation to: determine potential genotoxic mechanisms and hazards; identify misleading positives from in vitro genotoxicity assays; serve as new approach methodologies (NAMs) integrated into the standard battery of genotoxicity tests. Several transcriptomic biomarkers have been developed from sufficiently robust training data sets, validated with external test sets, and have demonstrated performance in multiple laboratories. These transcriptomic biomarkers can be used following established study designs and models designated through existing validation exercises in WoE evaluation. Bridging studies using a selection of training and test chemicals are needed to deviate from the established protocols to confirm performance when a transcriptomic biomarker is being applied in other: tissues, cell models, or gene expression platforms. Top dose selection and time of gene expression analysis are critical and should be established during transcriptomic biomarker development. These conditions are the only ones suited for transcriptomic biomarker use unless additional bridging or pharmacokinetic studies are conducted. Temporal effects for genotoxicants that operate via distinct mechanisms should be considered in data interpretation. Fixed transcriptomic biomarker gene sets and analytical processes do not need to be independently rederived in biomarker validation. Validation should focus on the performance of the gene set in external test sets. Robust external testing should ensure a minimum of additional chemicals spanning genotoxic and non-genotoxic modes of action. Genes in the transcriptomic biomarker do not need to be known to be mechanistically involved in genotoxicity responses. Existing frameworks described for NAMs could be applied for validation of transcriptomic biomarkers. Reproducibility of bioinformatic analysis is critical for the regulatory application of transcriptomic biomarkers. A bioinformatics expert should be involved with creating reproducible methods for the qualification and application of each transcriptomic biomarker.

摘要

基因表达生物标志物有潜力识别遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物,为综合测试提供机会并减少动物使用。2022年8月,举办了一次遗传毒性测试国际研讨会(IWGT),以严格审查当前使用转录组分析来识别遗传毒性物质的方法。在此,我们总结了工作组关于利用转录组生物标志物在体外和体内识别遗传毒性化学物质的科学现状的研究结果。共审查了1341篇论文,以确定最有希望识别遗传毒性物质的生物标志物。该分析揭示了两种独立推导的体内生物标志物和三种体外生物标志物,当与标准计算技术结合使用时,它们可以使用不同的基因表达谱平台在体内(大鼠或小鼠肝脏)或培养的人类细胞中识别遗传毒性化学物质,预测准确率≥92%。这些生物标志物已得到不同程度的验证,但通常在转录组平台和模型系统中显示出高重现性。它们在遗传毒性测试的不同应用场景中具有多个优势,包括:早期信号检测、中到高通量筛选能力、对不同细胞类型和组织的适应性,以及对DNA损伤反应机制信息的洞察。研讨会参与者就推进遗传毒性转录组生物标志物的监管采用达成了共识声明。参与者一致认为,转录组生物标志物有潜力与其他生物标志物结合用于体外综合测试策略,并通过短期啮齿动物暴露来识别可能导致癌症和可遗传基因效应的遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质。以下是工作组的共识声明。用于遗传毒性的转录组生物标志物可用于证据权重(WoE)评估,以:确定潜在的遗传毒性机制和危害;识别体外遗传毒性试验中的误导性阳性结果;作为新的方法学(NAMs)纳入标准的遗传毒性测试组合。几种转录组生物标志物已从足够稳健的训练数据集开发出来,并用外部测试集进行了验证,并在多个实验室中证明了性能。这些转录组生物标志物可按照既定的研究设计和通过现有WoE评估验证练习指定的模型使用。当在其他组织、细胞模型或基因表达平台应用转录组生物标志物时,需要使用选定的训练和测试化学品进行桥接研究,以偏离既定方案来确认性能。最高剂量选择和基因表达分析时间至关重要,应在转录组生物标志物开发过程中确定。除非进行额外的桥接或药代动力学研究,否则这些条件是唯一适合使用转录组生物标志物的条件。在数据解释中应考虑通过不同机制起作用的遗传毒性物质的时间效应。在生物标志物验证中,不需要独立重新推导固定的转录组生物标志物基因集和分析过程。验证应侧重于基因集在外部测试集中的性能。稳健的外部测试应确保至少有额外的化学品涵盖遗传毒性和非遗传毒性作用模式。转录组生物标志物中的基因不需要已知在遗传毒性反应中具有机制性参与。为NAMs描述的现有框架可用于转录组生物标志物的验证。生物信息学分析的重现性对于转录组生物标志物的监管应用至关重要。生物信息学专家应参与为每个转录组生物标志物的鉴定和应用创建可重现的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验