Skela-Savič Brigita, Bahun Mateja, Kalender Smajlović Sedina, Pivač Sanela
Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Spodnji Plavž 3, 4270 Jesenice, Slovenia.
Zdr Varst. 2025 Jan 2;64(1):5-13. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0002. eCollection 2025 Mar.
The aim of the study was to explore the experiences of patients with delivered healthcare in selected Slovenian hospitals.
A cross-sectional study was employed. A total of 1,748 patients participated. A shortened version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey was used. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the Slovenian Medical Ethics Committee. Data were collected between February and March 2020. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.
The average hospital rating was 8.86 (SD=1.47; p<0.001) out of 10. The hospital would be definitely recommended to others by 1,290 (75.7%) respondents. The regression model "patients' experience with care" was explained in 18%, mostly by "patients' general health status" (-0.267), "provision of written and oral information about symptoms or health problems post discharge" (-0.200), and "talking to patients about care post discharge" (-0.175). The model "hospital rate" was explained in 30.4% by "patients' experience with care" (0.576), "new medication was explained" (-0.242) and "patient age" (0.132).
The hospital rates are good and mostly explained by patient experience. The results revealed that tasks connected to comprehensive preparation of patients for healthcare treatment including communication, health education and appropriate discharge are only partially fulfilled. Improvements and holistic data capture are needed to make the measurement of patient experience a greater contribution to the improvement and efficiency of hospital care.
本研究旨在探讨斯洛文尼亚部分医院中患者接受医疗服务的体验。
采用横断面研究。共有1748名患者参与。使用了医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估调查的简化版。获得了斯洛文尼亚医学伦理委员会开展本研究的许可。数据于2020年2月至3月收集。进行了单变量、双变量和多变量分析。
医院平均评分为8.86(标准差=1.47;p<0.001)(满分10分)。1290名(75.7%)受访者肯定会向他人推荐该医院。“患者护理体验”回归模型的解释率为18%,主要由“患者的总体健康状况”(-0.267)、“出院后提供有关症状或健康问题的书面和口头信息”(-0.200)以及“与患者谈论出院后的护理”(-0.175)来解释。“医院评分”模型的解释率为30.4%,由“患者护理体验”(0.576)、“对新药进行了解释”(-0.242)和“患者年龄”(0.132)来解释。
医院评分良好,且主要由患者体验来解释。结果显示,与患者医疗治疗全面准备相关的任务,包括沟通(交流)、健康教育和适当出院等,仅部分得到落实。需要改进并进行全面的数据收集,以使患者体验的测量能为医院护理的改善和效率做出更大贡献。