Brahmanta Arya, Syahdinda Meralda Rossy, Kurniawan Hansen, Marya Anand, Chandrasekharan Deepak
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia.
J Orthod Sci. 2024 Nov 25;13:52. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_7_24. eCollection 2024.
To find out the difference, the type of facial profile, and facial asymmetry between manual methods and mobile application, which is named the face analyzer orthodontic application. Facial profiles can be determined from the side of the face, categorized into three types: straight, convex, and concave profiles. Facial asymmetry refers to the imbalance between facial components concerning size, shape, and opposing positions of planes, lines, or points.
The research design was a cross-sectional study design using extra oral patient photographs who were treated in Orthodontic Department of Nala Husada Dental Hospital, Surabaya. The technique used was simple random sampling. The number of samples obtained based on inclusion and exclusion criteria was 37 patients, ranged 9-15 years old. The facial profile and asymmetry were determined from extra oral photos before objectively analyzed and processed in face analyzer application by comparing with the manual technique. Wilcoxon test, used to determine the significance value of facial profiles and the facial asymmetry, was analyzed by McNemar's test.
Testing on two variables with two different treatment groups obtained > 0.05. The Wilcoxon test result ( = 0.157) indicates there is no significant difference, and the McNemar test result ( = 0.375) indicates there was no significant difference in the two groups.
The results of determining the facial profile and facial asymmetry showed no difference between manual and face analyzer orthodontic mobile applications.
找出手动方法与一款名为面部分析正畸应用程序的移动应用在面部轮廓类型和面部不对称方面的差异。面部轮廓可从面部侧面确定,分为三种类型:直面型、凸面型和凹面型。面部不对称是指面部各组成部分在大小、形状以及平面、线条或点的相对位置方面的不平衡。
本研究采用横断面研究设计,使用在泗水纳拉胡萨达牙科医院正畸科接受治疗的患者的口腔外照片。采用的技术是简单随机抽样。根据纳入和排除标准获得的样本数量为37例患者,年龄在9至15岁之间。在通过面部分析应用程序进行客观分析和处理之前,从口腔外照片中确定面部轮廓和不对称情况,并与手动技术进行比较。采用威尔科克森检验来确定面部轮廓和面部不对称的显著性值,并通过麦克尼马尔检验进行分析。
对两个不同治疗组的两个变量进行测试,结果>0.05。威尔科克森检验结果(=0.157)表明无显著差异,麦克尼马尔检验结果(=0.375)表明两组之间无显著差异。
确定面部轮廓和面部不对称的结果表明,手动正畸应用程序与面部分析正畸移动应用程序之间没有差异。