Mora-Salguero Daniela, Ranjard Lionel, Morvan Thierry, Dequiedt Samuel, Jean-Baptiste Vincent, Sadet-Bourgeteau Sophie
Agroécologie, French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), Institut Agro, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), UMR Sol Agro el hydrosystème Spatialisation, Rennes, France.
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 10;11(1):e41117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41117. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
Anaerobic digestion represents an opportunity for converting organic waste (OW) into valuable products: renewable energy (biogas) and a fertilizer (digestate). However, the long-term effects of digestates on soil biota, especially microorganisms, need to be better documented to understand the impact of digestate on soil ecosystem functioning and resilience. This study assessed the cumulative effect of repeated pig slurry digestate applications on soil microbial communities over a decade, using an in-situ approach to compare digested feedstock with undigested feedstock and other fertilization treatments. Conducted from 2012 to 2022 at an experimental field site in France, the study involved plots with identical agricultural soil management practices, differing only in fertilization treatments: mineral fertilizer, three different OW (cattle manure, pig slurry, pig slurry digestate), and a control with no organic or mineral fertilizer input. Changes in soil microbial communities were analyzed through molecular microbial biomass and diversity assessments using high-throughput sequencing targeting 16S and 18S ribosomal RNA genes. DNA extraction and molecular analyses were performed on soil samples collected at the start of the trial in 2012 and subsequently in 2017 and 2022. The long-term effects of annual digestate application over a decade include a higher soil microbial diversity in digestate-treated plots than in pig slurry-treated plots, and changes in the soil's microbial community structure and taxonomic composition resembling those observed with mineral fertilizer. Differential abundance analysis at the phylum level revealed few significant differences between digestate- and mineral fertilizer-treated plots for both prokaryotic and fungal communities. Only plots amended with cattle manure exhibited higher soil organic carbon content. Agricultural practices, along with climatic and environmental fluctuations, can significantly influence the response of soil microbial communities, thereby buffering the effects of fertilization treatments. Further research is needed to better understand the effects on soil microbial communities, considering the interactions between repeated digestate applications, different pedological contexts, and agricultural practices.
可再生能源(沼气)和肥料(沼渣)。然而,沼渣对土壤生物群尤其是微生物的长期影响,仍需更充分的记录,以便了解沼渣对土壤生态系统功能和恢复力的影响。本研究采用原位方法,将消化后的原料与未消化的原料及其他施肥处理进行比较,评估了十年来重复施用猪粪沼渣对土壤微生物群落的累积影响。该研究于2012年至2022年在法国的一个试验田进行,涉及具有相同农业土壤管理措施的地块,仅施肥处理不同:矿物肥料、三种不同的有机废物(牛粪、猪粪、猪粪沼渣),以及不输入有机或矿物肥料的对照地块。通过针对16S和18S核糖体RNA基因的高通量测序,对分子微生物生物量和多样性进行评估,分析土壤微生物群落的变化。在2012年试验开始时以及随后的2017年和2022年采集土壤样本,进行DNA提取和分子分析。十年间每年施用沼渣的长期影响包括,与猪粪处理地块相比,沼渣处理地块的土壤微生物多样性更高,且土壤微生物群落结构和分类组成的变化与矿物肥料处理地块相似。在门水平上的差异丰度分析表明,对于原核生物和真菌群落,沼渣处理地块与矿物肥料处理地块之间几乎没有显著差异。只有施用牛粪的地块土壤有机碳含量更高。农业实践以及气候和环境波动会显著影响土壤微生物群落的反应,从而缓冲施肥处理的效果。考虑到重复施用沼渣、不同土壤学背景和农业实践之间的相互作用,需要进一步研究以更好地了解对土壤微生物群落的影响。