Suppr超能文献

磁性输尿管支架的评估:系统评价与荟萃分析

Evaluation of Magnetic Ureteric Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Estaphanous Peter, Elbassyiouny Ahmed, Makar Youstina

机构信息

Urology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, NHS Trust, Coventry, GBR.

Medicine and Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, NHS Trust, Coventry, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 4;16(12):e75126. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75126. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Magnetic ureteric stents offer a novel approach for simplifying stent removal, minimizing patient discomfort, and reducing procedural burdens. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 12 studies involving 1,297 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnetic stent removal compared to conventional methods. Key outcomes included reductions in procedural pain scores, shorter removal times, and high patient satisfaction. Complication rates for magnetic stents were comparable to conventional stents, while cost analysis favored magnetic removal due to reduced resource utilization. These findings suggest magnetic stents are a safe, effective, and patient-friendly alternative. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm these benefits.

摘要

磁性输尿管支架为简化支架取出、减轻患者不适并减少操作负担提供了一种新方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析综合了12项研究(涉及1297例患者)的证据,以评估与传统方法相比,磁性支架取出的有效性和安全性。主要结果包括操作疼痛评分降低、取出时间缩短以及患者满意度高。磁性支架的并发症发生率与传统支架相当,而成本分析显示,由于资源利用减少,磁性取出更具优势。这些发现表明,磁性支架是一种安全、有效且对患者友好的替代方案。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究以证实这些益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c8/11699444/1f3da951c5a1/cureus-0016-00000075126-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验