Rasooly Alon, Manor Orly, Shao Ruitai, Ellen Moriah E, Davidovitch Nadav
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Health Syst Reform. 2025 Dec 31;11(1):2435076. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2024.2435076. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
In the pursuit of equitable diabetes care, international knowledge exchange (iKE) serves as a crucial mechanism for narrowing the gaps in quality within and between countries. Little is known about the process of quality measurement exchange among stakeholders from high-income countries (HICs), low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and international organizations. This study aims to analyze recent international exchanges of quality measures in diabetes care and propose a framework for enhancing quality, focusing on LMICs. Employing a realist evaluation methodology, we conducted database searches for peer-reviewed articles, international organizations' documents, and country-level reports. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with corresponding authors. Synthesis was achieved using the Two-Communities theory. The study encompassed 98 articles and reports from 44 countries and regions, supplemented by in-depth interviews with 13 informants. We delineate a framework for iKE of quality measures, highlighting three key approaches: "pull," "push," and "exchange." Researchers in HICs and LMICs utilize knowledge from other countries, adapting to local contexts through various processes. International organizations such as the World Health Organization and the International Diabetes Federation play pivotal roles in developing and disseminating measurement tools. "Exchange" processes expedite sharing, especially in LMICs, empowering local stakeholders. Global inequities in quality measurement underscore the need for collaborative efforts to address the Inverse Care Law. Finally, a realist framework was developed to guide stakeholders in identifying relevant iKE initiatives, facilitating gradual improvements in quality measurement. Balancing measurement burden with clinical care while strengthening primary care capacity and data systems is crucial for advancing equitable diabetes care globally.
在追求公平的糖尿病护理过程中,国际知识交流(iKE)是缩小国家内部和国家之间质量差距的关键机制。对于高收入国家(HICs)、低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)以及国际组织的利益相关者之间的质量测量交流过程,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在分析糖尿病护理质量措施的近期国际交流情况,并提出一个以低收入和中等收入国家为重点的提高质量的框架。我们采用现实主义评价方法,对同行评审文章、国际组织文件和国家层面报告进行数据库检索。对通讯作者进行了半结构化在线访谈。运用双社区理论进行综合分析。该研究涵盖了来自44个国家和地区的98篇文章和报告,并辅以对13名受访者的深入访谈。我们勾勒出一个质量措施国际知识交流的框架,突出了三种关键方法:“拉”“推”和“交流”。高收入国家和低收入和中等收入国家的研究人员利用其他国家的知识,通过各种过程适应当地情况。世界卫生组织和国际糖尿病联合会等国际组织在开发和传播测量工具方面发挥着关键作用。“交流”过程加快了分享速度,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家,增强了当地利益相关者的能力。质量测量方面的全球不平等凸显了共同努力解决逆医疗法则的必要性。最后,制定了一个现实主义框架,以指导利益相关者确定相关的国际知识交流举措,促进质量测量的逐步改进。在加强初级保健能力和数据系统的同时,平衡测量负担与临床护理对于在全球推进公平的糖尿病护理至关重要。