Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Neurosciences, ASST Ovest Milanese - Legnano Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Neurosurgery. 2024 Oct 1;95(4):e121-e131. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002935. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Despite the globalization of health information, collaborations between high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs), while present, could still increase. This study builds on previous research highlighting LMIC underrepresentation in neurosurgery literature. We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database to investigate collaborative neurosurgical research between HIC institutions and those in low-income country (LIC)/LMICs. Articles published between 2018 and 2020 were examined. Articles were categorized into 3 groups: guidelines, conferences, and consensus statements; articles related to training and collaborations; and other articles. We categorized articles and authors by country, role, and specific subtopic. We included 238 reports from 34 neurosurgical journals for analysis. Geographic distribution indicated that India led LIC/LMIC contributions (25.21%). Among HICs, the United States had the highest contribution (47.76%). In collaborative studies, Uganda, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Nigeria made significant contributions. LICs and LMICs accounted for 446 authors, while HICs contributed with 592. India has presented the highest number of authors in significant positions. In HICs, significant positions are recognized in USA articles. When scoring authors' position in collaborative papers, still HICs had a clear prevalence. The highest number of collaborations between HICs and LICs/LMICs has been observed in articles related to training and collaborations. Kenya matched India's contributions in training and collaborations. Global guidelines and consensus papers can enhance patient care, but LMICs' involvement remains limited. Further attention to training and collaboration initiatives is needed. This study emphasizes the importance of promoting collaboration and training between countries with varying resources to advance neurosurgical care globally.
尽管健康信息已经全球化,但高收入国家(HICs)与中低收入国家(LMICs)之间的合作仍然存在,可以进一步增加。本研究基于先前的研究,这些研究强调了中低收入国家在神经外科学文献中的代表性不足。我们使用 Scopus 数据库进行了全面的文献计量分析,以调查 HIC 机构与低收入国家/中低收入国家(LIC/LMICs)之间的合作神经外科学研究。检查了 2018 年至 2020 年期间发表的文章。文章分为 3 组:指南、会议和共识声明;与培训和合作相关的文章;和其他文章。我们按国家、角色和特定子主题对文章和作者进行了分类。我们包括了 34 种神经外科期刊的 238 份报告进行分析。地理分布表明,印度引领了 LIC/LMIC 的贡献(25.21%)。在 HICs 中,美国的贡献最高(47.76%)。在合作研究中,乌干达、喀麦隆、坦桑尼亚、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚做出了重要贡献。LICs 和 LMICs 有 446 名作者,而 HICs 则有 592 名作者。印度拥有最多处于重要职位的作者。在 HICs 中,美国文章中认可了重要职位。在对合作论文中作者的地位进行评分时,HICs 仍然明显占主导地位。在与培训和合作相关的文章中,观察到 HICs 与 LICs/LMICs 之间的合作最多。肯尼亚在培训和合作方面与印度的贡献相匹配。全球指南和共识文件可以提高患者护理水平,但 LMICs 的参与仍然有限。需要进一步关注培训和合作计划。本研究强调了促进资源不同的国家之间合作和培训的重要性,以在全球范围内推进神经外科学护理。