Liu Yudong, Guo Longmei, Feng Yanqing, Hua Jiahao, Dai Qingyuan, Chen Ziyang, Song Wenlu, Guo Bing, Chen Taicong, Ji Li
Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05423-6.
Proper torque control is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to employ finite element analysis to compare the torque capabilities of a novel spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system against those of commonly used passive self-ligating and conventional bracket systems, as well as to reveal the biomechanical changes in the periodontal ligament (PDL) during torque expression.
A maxillary right central incisor, along with its PDL and alveolar bone, were modeled. Three types of brackets were selected: a spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system, a passive self-ligating bracket (Damon), and a conventional bracket (Discovery). Each bracket was equipped with a 0.022-inch slot and a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire. A palatal root torque of 20° was applied. The torque moment, as well as the von Mises stress and strain in the PDL, were calculated. A clinical case involving the lingual inclination of the upper anterior teeth was utilized to assess the feasibility of using the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system to express torque.
At a twist angle of 20°, the maximum torque generated by the spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system (27.8 N·mm) was approximately 1.6 times greater than that of the Damon bracket (17.5 N·mm) and the Discovery bracket (17.3 N·mm). As the twist angle increased, both the von Mises stress and the strain in the PDL also increased. When the maximum PDL stress was less than 0.026 MPa and the percentage of the PDL good strain area (defined as the area with PDL strain ≥ 0.3%) exceeded 50%, the torque range for the maxillary incisor was between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm. The clinical case demonstrated that the use of the spherical self-ligating bracket with the lock-hook system effectively corrected the unfavorable linguoclination of the maxillary incisors.
The spherical self-ligating bracket with a lock-hook system can significantly enhance torque expression. The optimal torque range for the maxillary incisor is between 10.2 and 17.5 N·mm.
适当的转矩控制对正畸治疗的结果至关重要。本研究旨在采用有限元分析,比较一种新型带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽与常用的被动自锁托槽和传统托槽系统的转矩能力,并揭示转矩表达过程中牙周膜(PDL)的生物力学变化。
对上颌右侧中切牙及其牙周膜和牙槽骨进行建模。选择三种类型的托槽:一种带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽、一种被动自锁托槽(Damon)和一种传统托槽(Discovery)。每个托槽均配有0.022英寸的槽沟和一根0.019×0.025英寸的不锈钢弓丝。施加20°的腭根转矩。计算转矩以及牙周膜中的von Mises应力和应变。利用一个涉及上前牙舌倾的临床病例来评估使用带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽表达转矩的可行性。
在扭转角度为20°时,带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽产生的最大转矩(27.8N·mm)约为Damon托槽(17.5N·mm)和Discovery托槽(17.3N·mm)的1.6倍。随着扭转角度的增加,牙周膜中的von Mises应力和应变也增加。当上颌切牙的最大牙周膜应力小于0.026MPa且牙周膜良好应变区(定义为牙周膜应变≥0.3%的区域)的百分比超过50%时,转矩范围在10.2至17.5N·mm之间。临床病例表明,使用带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽可有效纠正上颌切牙不利的舌倾。
带锁钩系统的球形自锁托槽可显著增强转矩表达。上颌切牙的最佳转矩范围在10.2至17.5N·mm之间。