Fracture Resistance of Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Partial and Full Coverage Crowns and Veneers for Maxillary Canines.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of chairside computer assisted design and computer assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate partial and full-coverage crowns and veneers for maxillary canines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight restorations for maxillary right canines (12 per group) were designed as follows: (1) partial crown with finish line in the upper middle third; (2) partial crown with finish line in the lower middle third; (3) traditional labial veneer; and (4) traditional full-coverage crown. Restorations were fabricated out of lithium disilicate (Amber Mill, Hassbio) using a chairside CAD-CAM system (Cerec Dentsply Sirona). Partial and full crowns and veneers were treated with a primer system (Monobond Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent) and cemented using dual-cure resin cement (Variolink Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent) and cemented to printed resin dies. Subsequently, the restorations were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C with a dwell time of 30 seconds. The restorations were then loaded axially on the incisal edge in compression to fracture with a flat indenter.

RESULTS

Full-coverage crowns displayed the highest fracture resistance (809±28.57 N) followed by partial crowns with finish line in lower third (649±21.74 N) and crowns with finish line in upper third (421±17.46 N). Veneers displayed the lowest fracture resistance values (259±15.69 N).

CONCLUSIONS

The fracture resistance of partial and full-coverage crowns and veneers was significantly influenced by the design. Full coverage crowns displayed the highest fracture resistance and partial crowns showed higher fracture resistance than traditional veneers.