Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后经皮电刺激神经疗法与微电流电刺激神经肌肉疗法效果的比较

Comparison of the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation after total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Maeda Takaya, Yoshida Hideki, Wakai Yuji, Sasaki Tomoyuki

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Hirosaki Memorial Hospital: 59-1 Sakaizeki Nishida, Hirosaki-shi, Aomori 036-8076, Japan.

Department of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Japan.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2025 Jan;37(1):52-56. doi: 10.1589/jpts.37.52. Epub 2025 Jan 1.

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation on pain relief and knee function following total knee arthroplasty. [Participants and Methods] This was a prospective, single-center, three-group parallel study. Thirty-five patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were divided into transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation, and control groups. Interventions began on postoperative day 3 and continued for two weeks. Pain intensity during walking, maximum walking speed, timed up-and-go test, and isometric knee extension strength were assessed preoperatively, and two and four weeks postoperatively. [Results] Two weeks postoperatively, pain during walking was lower in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group than in other groups, and maximum walking speed was significantly faster in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group than in the microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation group but not in the control group. Timed up-and-go and isometric knee extension strength improvements were observed gradually but were not significantly different between the groups. [Conclusion] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectively relieved pain and improved walking speed early after total knee arthroplasty, whereas microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulation did not show significant benefits compared to the control.

摘要

[目的] 本研究旨在比较经皮电刺激神经疗法和微电流电刺激神经肌肉疗法对全膝关节置换术后疼痛缓解及膝关节功能的影响。[参与者与方法] 这是一项前瞻性、单中心、三组平行研究。35例计划行全膝关节置换术的患者被分为经皮电刺激神经疗法组、微电流电刺激神经肌肉疗法组和对照组。干预从术后第3天开始,持续两周。术前、术后两周和四周评估行走时的疼痛强度、最大行走速度、计时起立行走测试及等长伸膝力量。[结果] 术后两周,经皮电刺激神经疗法组行走时的疼痛低于其他组,且经皮电刺激神经疗法组的最大行走速度显著快于微电流电刺激神经肌肉疗法组,但与对照组相比无显著差异。计时起立行走测试及等长伸膝力量逐渐改善,但组间无显著差异。[结论] 经皮电刺激神经疗法在全膝关节置换术后早期能有效缓解疼痛并提高行走速度,而微电流电刺激神经肌肉疗法与对照组相比未显示出显著益处。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验