Suppr超能文献

乌卢齐亚文化和夏特佩罗尼文化:在共同的时间框架内不存在技术关联。

The Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework.

作者信息

Marciani Giulia, Carmignani Leonardo, Djakovic Igor, Roussel Morgan, Arrighi Simona, Rossini Matteo, Boschin Francesco, Ronchitelli Annamaria, Benazzi Stefano, Moroni Adriana, Soressi Marie

机构信息

Dipartimento Di Beni Culturali, Università Di Bologna, Via Degli Ariani 1, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.

Dipartimento Di Scienze Fisiche, Della Terra E Dell'Ambiente, U. R. Preistoria E Antropologia, Università Di Siena, Via Laterina 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.

出版信息

J Paleolit Archaeol. 2025;8(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s41982-024-00202-1. Epub 2025 Jan 4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections. This study results from a one-week workshop designed to bring relevant researchers together to conduct an in-person investigation of these lithic industries. Our analysis highlights significant technological divergences between these industries. In short, the Châtelperronian is a blade industry with a minor bladelet component produced by freehand direct percussion, whereas the Uluzzian is a flake-bladelet industry with massive use of bipolar percussion and a minor component produced by freehand, direct percussion. Our results suggest that there are no, or very little, technological affinities between the Châtelperronian and the Uluzzian - despite occupying the same window of time. As an extension, this suggests that there was little to no relationship/contact between the groups producing these industries during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition. The distinctiveness of the Châtelperronian and Uluzzian highlights that technological behaviours in western Europe during the 45-40 ka can be very diverse and that general labels such as 'transitional industries' are unsatisfactory in describing this diversity.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41982-024-00202-1.

摘要

未标注

夏特佩罗尼文化和乌卢兹文化技术复合体在西欧处于相同地层位置,介于旧石器时代中期晚期和其他旧石器时代晚期组合之间。这两种文化都包括有突然修整和拱背的修整器物,放射性测年表明这两种技术复合体属于同一时间窗口。在此,我们基于对这些藏品的合作、第一手检查,对两个夏特佩罗尼文化和两个乌卢兹文化的石器组合进行了详细的定性技术比较。这项研究源于一个为期一周的研讨会,旨在召集相关研究人员对这些石器文化进行实地调查。我们的分析突出了这些文化之间显著的技术差异。简而言之,夏特佩罗尼文化是一种以徒手直接打击法生产的、带有少量细石叶成分的石叶文化,而乌卢兹文化是一种大量使用双极打击法且少量成分由徒手直接打击法生产的石片 - 细石叶文化。我们的结果表明,尽管处于同一时间窗口,但夏特佩罗尼文化和乌卢兹文化之间不存在或几乎不存在技术亲缘关系。由此延伸可知,在旧石器时代中期向晚期过渡期间,生产这些文化的群体之间几乎没有关系/接触。夏特佩罗尼文化和乌卢兹文化的独特性凸显出,在45 - 40 ka期间西欧的技术行为可能非常多样,并且诸如“过渡文化”这样的通用标签在描述这种多样性时并不令人满意。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s41982 - 024 - 00202 - 1获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f4/11700062/f7cb6af311f4/41982_2024_202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验