• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解对信息过程模型干预的反应:矛盾情绪作为一种改变机制。

Understanding Reactions to Informative Process Model Interventions: Ambivalence as a Mechanism of Change.

作者信息

Rosler Nimrod, Wiener-Blotner Ori, Heskiau Micheles Orel, Sharvit Keren

机构信息

Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;14(12):1152. doi: 10.3390/bs14121152.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121152
PMID:39767293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11672873/
Abstract

Transforming the course of protracted and bloody conflicts requires changing the behaviors and minds of society members who take part in these conflicts. While studies examining the psychology of such societies point to the barriers that conflict-supporting narratives create for changing minds and behavior, a novel psychological intervention offers a new direction to facilitate openness for attitude change based on the Information Process Model (IPM). Previous studies indicated the effectiveness of this intervention in creating an unfreezing of conflict attitudes and increasing support for peace negotiation in different conflict areas. However, since the psychological process underlying its effectiveness remains underexplored, the aim of the current research is to examine the experiences of participants exposed to IPM-based messages and the role of cognitive and emotional ambivalence in facilitating the unfreezing of conflict-supporting narrative and contemplating alternative beliefs. The first study (n = 234) examines how IPM (vs. control) videos increase engagement with and ambivalence towards conflict-supporting narratives using quantitative and qualitative analysis of written Decisional Balance responses. The second study (n = 24) delves into the expressions of cognitive and emotional ambivalence following exposure to different segments of an IPM video using semi-structured interviews, and further assesses their potential influence on facilitating contemplation with newly provided information.

摘要

改变长期血腥冲突的进程需要改变参与这些冲突的社会成员的行为和观念。虽然研究此类社会心理的研究指出了支持冲突的叙事为改变观念和行为所造成的障碍,但一种新颖的心理干预措施基于信息处理模型(IPM)为促进态度改变的开放性提供了新方向。先前的研究表明,这种干预措施在消除冲突态度的僵化以及增强不同冲突地区对和平谈判的支持方面是有效的。然而,由于其有效性背后的心理过程仍未得到充分探索,当前研究的目的是考察接触基于IPM的信息的参与者的经历,以及认知和情感矛盾心理在促进支持冲突的叙事的解冻和思考替代信念方面的作用。第一项研究(n = 234)使用对书面决策平衡反应的定量和定性分析,考察IPM(与对照组相比)视频如何增加对支持冲突的叙事的参与度和矛盾心理。第二项研究(n = 24)使用半结构化访谈深入探究接触IPM视频不同片段后认知和情感矛盾心理的表达,并进一步评估它们对促进用新提供的信息进行思考的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/59ca43be7f57/behavsci-14-01152-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/1cfdff059a67/behavsci-14-01152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/e0a3eab96aa7/behavsci-14-01152-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/3f785d10a2cd/behavsci-14-01152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/59ca43be7f57/behavsci-14-01152-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/1cfdff059a67/behavsci-14-01152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/e0a3eab96aa7/behavsci-14-01152-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/3f785d10a2cd/behavsci-14-01152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df75/11672873/59ca43be7f57/behavsci-14-01152-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding Reactions to Informative Process Model Interventions: Ambivalence as a Mechanism of Change.理解对信息过程模型干预的反应:矛盾情绪作为一种改变机制。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;14(12):1152. doi: 10.3390/bs14121152.
2
The Informative Process Model as a New Intervention for Attitude Change in Intractable Conflicts: Theory and Empirical Evidence.信息过程模型作为解决棘手冲突中态度转变的一种新干预措施:理论与实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:946410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946410. eCollection 2022.
3
From acceptance to change: The role of acceptance in the effectiveness of the Informative Process Model for conflict resolution.从接纳到改变:接纳在冲突解决信息过程模型有效性中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12802. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12802. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Current and Future Costs of Intractable Conflicts-Can They Create Attitude Change?棘手冲突的当前及未来成本——它们能引发态度转变吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 May 26;12:681883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681883. eCollection 2021.
5
Predictors and predictive effects of ambivalence.矛盾情绪的预测因素及预测效果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):371-83. doi: 10.1348/0144666042037980.
6
Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots.让我们不要对机器人漠不关心:在双相措施上的中立评价掩盖了人们对机器人态度的矛盾心理。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0244697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244697. eCollection 2021.
7
The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model.矛盾心理的痛苦及其解决方法:介绍MAID模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb;13(1):45-61. doi: 10.1177/1088868308324518.
8
Paradoxical Thinking as a Conflict-Resolution Intervention: Comparison to Alternative Interventions and Examination of Psychological Mechanisms.悖论思维作为一种冲突解决干预措施:与其他干预措施的比较以及对心理机制的考察。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jan;44(1):122-139. doi: 10.1177/0146167217736048. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
9
The decisional balance, attitudes, and practice behaviors, its predicting factors, and related experiences of advance care planning in Taiwanese patients with advanced cancer.台湾地区晚期癌症患者的决策平衡、态度、实践行为及其预测因素,以及与预先医疗照护计划相关的经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 2;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01073-5.
10
Ambivalence and Interpersonal Liking: The Expression of Ambivalence as Social Validation of Attitudinal Conflict.矛盾心理与人际喜爱:矛盾心理的表达作为态度冲突的社会验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 29;11:525301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525301. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
From acceptance to change: The role of acceptance in the effectiveness of the Informative Process Model for conflict resolution.从接纳到改变:接纳在冲突解决信息过程模型有效性中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12802. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12802. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Comparison of the Predictors of Smoking Cessation Plans between Adolescent Conventional Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Smokers Using the Transtheoretical Model.使用跨理论模型比较青少年传统香烟吸烟者和电子烟吸烟者戒烟计划的预测因素
Children (Basel). 2024 May 15;11(5):598. doi: 10.3390/children11050598.
3
Turning the lens in the study of precarity: On experimental social psychology's acquiescence to the settler-colonial status quo in historic Palestine.
将镜头转向脆弱性研究:论实验社会心理学对历史上巴勒斯坦的殖民现状的默许。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-38. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12595. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
4
Understanding farmers' conservation behavior over time: A longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model of behavior change.随着时间推移理解农民的保护行为:行为改变跨理论模型的纵向应用。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116136. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116136. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
The Informative Process Model as a New Intervention for Attitude Change in Intractable Conflicts: Theory and Empirical Evidence.信息过程模型作为解决棘手冲突中态度转变的一种新干预措施:理论与实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:946410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946410. eCollection 2022.
6
Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges.偏见减少:进展与挑战。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:533-560. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
The effect of transtheoretical model-lead intervention for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: a cluster randomized trial.跨理论模型引导的干预对老年人膝骨关节炎的影响:一项整群随机试验
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 8;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02222-y.
8
Determining the Influencing Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption Intention in Pakistan: The Moderating Role of Social Media.确定巴基斯坦沼气技术采用意向的影响因素:社交媒体的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):2311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072311.
9
Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science.态度根源与柔术说服:理解和克服对科学的有动机排斥。
Am Psychol. 2017 Jul-Aug;72(5):459-473. doi: 10.1037/a0040437.
10
The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization.人类的堕落:公然非人化的理论与实证依据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Nov;109(5):901-31. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000048. Epub 2015 Jun 29.