• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用雇主赞助的数字心理健康平台的有色人种和白人成年人的使用情况、满意度及临床结果

Utilization, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes of People of Color and White Adults Using an Employer-Sponsored Digital Mental Health Platform.

作者信息

Sagui Henson Sara J, Welcome Chamberlain Camille E, Smith Brooke J, Jackson Jessica L, Adusei Sharon L, Castro Sweet Cynthia M

机构信息

Modern Health, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 12;21(12):1660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121660.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21121660
PMID:39767499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675968/
Abstract

Evaluating digital mental health services across racial and ethnic identities is crucial to ensuring health equity. We examined how People of Color (POC) and White adults were using and benefiting from an employer-sponsored digital mental health platform. A sample of 947 adults (42% POC) consented to an observational study and completed surveys on their identities and mental health outcomes at baseline and three-month follow-up. We examined care preferences, utilization, therapeutic alliance with mental health providers, and changes in outcomes among POC and White adults. At baseline, there were no race or ethnicity differences in preferred topics of focus ( = 0.36), rates of depression, anxiety, or loneliness (s > 0.35), or self-reported well-being or stress (s > 0.07). POC adults were more likely to prefer one-on-one care than White adults ( = 0.02). After 3 months of care utilization, there were no differences in therapeutic alliance ( = 0.52), use of therapy, coaching, or self-guided digital resources (s > 0.47), or in the likelihood of improving, recovering, or maintaining clinical symptoms or psychosocial factors (s > 0.07). Utilization, satisfaction, and clinical effectiveness were similar between POC and White adults, indicating the platform may offer comparable experiences. Evaluating utilization and outcomes among POC communities is necessary to inform consumers and help developers assess if innovations are fostering health equity.

摘要

评估不同种族和族裔身份人群的数字心理健康服务对于确保健康公平至关重要。我们研究了有色人种(POC)和白人成年人如何使用雇主赞助的数字心理健康平台并从中受益。947名成年人(42%为有色人种)参与了一项观察性研究,并在基线和三个月随访时完成了关于他们的身份和心理健康结果的调查。我们研究了有色人种和白人成年人在护理偏好、利用率、与心理健康提供者的治疗联盟以及结果变化方面的情况。在基线时,在首选关注主题(F = 0.36)、抑郁、焦虑或孤独发生率(p > 0.35)或自我报告的幸福感或压力(p > 0.07)方面,不存在种族或族裔差异。有色人种成年人比白人成年人更倾向于一对一护理(p = 0.02)。在使用护理3个月后,在治疗联盟(F = 0.52)、治疗、辅导或自我指导数字资源的使用(p > 0.47),或改善、康复或维持临床症状或心理社会因素的可能性(p > 0.07)方面,没有差异。有色人种和白人成年人在利用率、满意度和临床效果方面相似,这表明该平台可能提供类似的体验。评估有色人种社区的利用率和结果对于告知消费者并帮助开发者评估创新是否促进健康公平是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d111/11675968/b465c33bd841/ijerph-21-01660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d111/11675968/b465c33bd841/ijerph-21-01660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d111/11675968/b465c33bd841/ijerph-21-01660-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes of People of Color and White Adults Using an Employer-Sponsored Digital Mental Health Platform.使用雇主赞助的数字心理健康平台的有色人种和白人成年人的使用情况、满意度及临床结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 12;21(12):1660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121660.
2
Improvement and Maintenance of Clinical Outcomes in a Digital Mental Health Platform: Findings From a Longitudinal Observational Real-World Study.数字心理健康平台中临床结局的改善和维持:一项纵向观察性真实世界研究的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 24;12:e48298. doi: 10.2196/48298.
3
Predictors of Engagement in Multiple Modalities of Digital Mental Health Treatments: Longitudinal Study.预测数字心理健康治疗多种模式的参与因素:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 7;26:e48696. doi: 10.2196/48696.
4
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.
5
The Impact of Digital Mental Health Services on Loneliness and Mental Health: Results from a Prospective, Observational Study.数字心理健康服务对孤独感和心理健康的影响:一项前瞻性、观察性研究的结果。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Jun;31(3):468-478. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10204-y. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Racial and ethnic differences in mental healthcare utilization consistent with potentially effective care: The role of patient preferences.心理保健利用方面与潜在有效护理相符的种族和族裔差异:患者偏好的作用。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 May;46:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
8
E-health: psychosocial challenges for South Australian rural mental health consumers.电子健康:南澳大利亚农村心理健康消费者面临的社会心理挑战。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Aug;19(3):5103. doi: 10.22605/RRH5103. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Mental Health and Care Utilization Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth by Race and Ethnicity.按种族和族裔划分的性取向和性别认同少数青年的心理健康与医疗服务利用情况
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Apr;76(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.244. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
10
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Psychiatric Traits and Diagnoses within a Community-based Sample of Children and Youth: Disparités raciales/ethniques dans les traits et diagnostics psychiatriques au sein d'un échantillon communautaire d'enfants et de jeunes.基于社区的儿童和青少年样本中的精神特征和诊断的种族/民族差异:社区样本中的儿童和青少年精神特征和诊断的种族/民族差异。
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;69(6):415-427. doi: 10.1177/07067437241233936. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvement and Maintenance of Clinical Outcomes in a Digital Mental Health Platform: Findings From a Longitudinal Observational Real-World Study.数字心理健康平台中临床结局的改善和维持:一项纵向观察性真实世界研究的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 24;12:e48298. doi: 10.2196/48298.
2
Cultural Responsivity in Technology-Enabled Services: Integrating Culture Into Technology and Service Components.技术支持服务中的文化响应性:将文化融入技术和服务组件中。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e45409. doi: 10.2196/45409.
3
The Impact of Digital Mental Health Services on Loneliness and Mental Health: Results from a Prospective, Observational Study.
数字心理健康服务对孤独感和心理健康的影响:一项前瞻性、观察性研究的结果。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Jun;31(3):468-478. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10204-y. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Should We Trust You? Strategies to Improve Access to Mental Healthcare to BIPOC Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.我们应否信任你?在新冠疫情期间,改善族裔少数群体获得精神健康医疗服务的策略。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jan;60(1):82-86. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01124-y. Epub 2023 May 3.
5
Inequitable access to general and behavioral healthcare in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic: A role for telehealth?美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间普遍存在获得医疗和行为保健服务机会不平等的现象:远程医疗是否能发挥作用?
Prev Med. 2023 Apr;169:107426. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107426. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
Blended Care Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: Outcomes across Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups.抑郁症和焦虑症的混合式护理治疗:不同种族和族裔群体的结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):2731-2743. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01450-z. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Comparison of outcomes across low-intensity psychological interventions for depression and anxiety within a stepped-care setting: A naturalistic cohort study using propensity score modelling.在阶梯式照护环境中比较针对抑郁和焦虑的低强度心理干预的效果:一项使用倾向得分模型的自然队列研究。
Br J Psychol. 2023 May;114(2):299-314. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12614. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
8
Culturally adapted digital mental health interventions for ethnic/racial minorities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.文化适应的数字化心理健康干预措施在少数族裔/种族群体中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Oct;90(10):717-733. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000759. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Impact of Online Group Psychoeducation and Support Sessions on Receptivity Towards Digital Mental Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study.在线团体心理教育与支持课程对COVID-19大流行期间数字心理健康护理接受度的影响:一项试点研究。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2022 Sep 24:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00281-3.
10
Real world effectiveness of digital mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间数字心理健康服务的真实世界效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0272162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272162. eCollection 2022.