McGranaghan Peter, Pallinger Éva, Fekete Nóra, Maurovich-Horvát Pál, Drobni Zsófia, Merkely Béla, Menna Luigi, Buzás Edit I, Hegyesi Hargita
Biomarker Department, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Genetics, Cell and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 25;12(12):2682. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122682.
: We aimed to assess the relationship among circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs), hypoxia-related proteins, and the conventional risk factors of life-threatening coronary artery disease (CAD) to find more precise novel biomarkers. : Patients were categorized based on coronary CT angiography. Patients with a Segment Involvement Score > 5 were identified as CAD patients. Individuals with a Segment Involvement Score < 5 were considered control subjects. The characterization of EVs and analysis of the plasma concentration of growth differentiation factor-15 were performed using multicolor or bead-based flow cytometry. The plasma protein levels of glycogen phosphorylase, muscle form, clusterin, and carboxypeptidase N subunit 1 were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association of the biomarkers with the CAD outcome after accounting for established risk factors. The analysis was built in three steps: first, we included the basic clinical and laboratory variables (Model 1), then we integrated the plasma protein values (Model 2), and finally, we complemented it with the circulating EV pattern (Model 3). To assess the discrimination value of the models, an area under (AUC) the receiver operating curve was calculated and compared across the three models. : The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.68, 0.77, and 0.84 in Models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The variables with the greatest impact on the AUC values were hemoglobin (0.2 (0.16-0.26)) in Model 1, carboxypeptidase N subunit 1 (0.12 (0.09-0.14)) in Model 2, and circulating CD41+/CD61+ EVs (0.31 (0.15-0.5)) in Model 3. A correlation analysis showed a significant impact of circulating CD41+/CD61+ platelet-derived EVs ( = 0.03, r = -0.4176) in Model 3. : Based on our results, the circulating EV profile can be used as a supportive biomarker, along with the conventional laboratory markers of CAD, and it enables a more sensitive, non-invasive diagnostic analysis of CAD.
我们旨在评估循环细胞外囊泡(EVs)、缺氧相关蛋白与危及生命的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)传统危险因素之间的关系,以寻找更精确的新型生物标志物。患者根据冠状动脉CT血管造影进行分类。节段累及评分>5的患者被确定为CAD患者。节段累及评分<5的个体被视为对照对象。使用多色或基于微珠的流式细胞术对EVs进行表征,并分析血浆中生长分化因子-15的浓度。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法测定血浆中糖原磷酸化酶、肌肉型、簇蛋白和羧肽酶N亚基1的蛋白水平。在考虑既定危险因素后,使用多元逻辑回归来确定生物标志物与CAD结局之间的关联。分析分三步进行:首先,我们纳入基本临床和实验室变量(模型1),然后整合血浆蛋白值(模型2),最后,用循环EV模式对其进行补充(模型3)。为了评估模型的判别价值,计算并比较了三个模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。模型1、2和3的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.68、0.77和0.84。对AUC值影响最大的变量在模型1中是血红蛋白(0.2(0.16 - 0.26)),在模型2中是羧肽酶N亚基1(0.12(0.09 - 0.14)),在模型3中是循环CD41 + /CD61 + EVs(0.31(0.15 - 0.5))。相关性分析显示,模型3中循环CD41 + /CD61 + 血小板衍生的EVs有显著影响(P = 0.03,r = -0.4176)。基于我们的结果,循环EV谱可作为CAD传统实验室标志物之外的一种辅助生物标志物,并且能够对CAD进行更敏感的非侵入性诊断分析。