Sayyad Mohammed Hani, Levi Nir, Bruoha Sharon, Zalut Todd, Taha Louay, Karmi Mohammad, Perel Nimrod, Maller Tomer, Zacks Netanel, Sherm Maayan, Fink Noam, Sabouret Pierre, Nasir Khurram, Bar-Sheshet Sarit, Glikson Michael, Asher Elad
Emergency Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Eisenberg R&D Authority and Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
Life (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1563. doi: 10.3390/life14121563.
Cardiac troponin I is routinely measured in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, when a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) test is ordered without a clear clinical indication, unexpectedly elevated levels can lead to unnecessary diagnostic workups and inappropriate management. This study aimed to investigate physicians' rationale for performing hs-cTnI tests in an emergency department (ED).
In this prospective study, 1890 patients who underwent hs-cTnI measurement during their stay in an ED were included. Upon arrival, patients were classified into two groups based on their chief complaints: cardiac (36.6%) and non-cardiac (63.4%). Forty-seven ED physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess their perspectives on the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing in the ED.
Out of the 47 ED physicians who responded to the questionnaire (94% response rate), 97.9% indicated that the purpose of hs-cTnI testing in the ED was to diagnose an acute cardiac event. However, 38.3% reported ordering hs-cTnI tests in non-cardiac patients due to medicolegal concerns. Additionally, 53% admitted to working under medicolegal pressure, and 50% believe they would have ordered fewer hs-cTnI tests if not for this medicolegal threat.
defensive medicine is prevalent among ED physicians, and routine use of hs-cTnI testing as part of an evaluation can be explained in part by concern about liability and defensive medicine.
对于疑似急性冠脉综合征的患者,通常会检测心肌肌钙蛋白I。然而,在没有明确临床指征的情况下进行高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)检测时,意外升高的水平可能导致不必要的诊断检查和不恰当的处理。本研究旨在调查急诊科医生进行hs-cTnI检测的理由。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了1890名在急诊科就诊期间接受hs-cTnI检测的患者。患者到达时,根据主要症状分为两组:心脏相关症状组(36.6%)和非心脏相关症状组(63.4%)。47名急诊科医生被要求填写一份问卷,以评估他们对在急诊科使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)检测的看法。
在47名回复问卷的急诊科医生中(回复率为94%),97.9%表示在急诊科进行hs-cTnI检测的目的是诊断急性心脏事件。然而,38.3%报告因法律担忧而对非心脏相关症状患者进行hs-cTnI检测。此外,53%承认在法律压力下工作,50%认为如果没有这种法律威胁,他们会减少hs-cTnI检测的开具。
防御性医疗在急诊科医生中很普遍,将hs-cTnI检测作为评估的常规部分,部分原因可能是对责任的担忧和防御性医疗。