Siewert Marta, Pokrowiecki Rafał, Zawadzki Paweł J, Stopa Zygmunt
Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Surgery and Implantology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Private Practice, 02-640 Warsaw, Poland.
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 3;14(12):1594. doi: 10.3390/life14121594.
The objective of this study was to compare single-needle arthrocentesis with the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis, as well as the additional intracapsular injection of hyaluronic acid or platelet-rich fibrin. A total of 96 patients with established osteoarthritis (OA) ( = 48) or with internal de-arrangement (DD) ( = 48) were assigned single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the joint or conventional two-needle arthrocentesis with or without intracapsular injection of the medication (hyaluronic acid (HA) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP)) performed every month over a period of 6 months. The maximum mouth opening and pain, as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), were compared. Each group exhibited significant improvement, i.e., a decrease in pain and an increase in mouth opening. The single-puncture technique provided similar pain reduction as the two-needle approach but provided significantly better results in terms of maximum mouth opening. The reduction in pain was similar when comparing the OA and DD cohorts; however, patients with disc displacement achieved significantly better mouth opening than OA. Intracapsular application of medication contributed to a significant decrease in pain in both HA and PRP groups, with platelet-rich fibrin being significantly superior to HA in terms of mouth opening improvement.
本研究的目的是比较单针关节穿刺术与传统双针关节穿刺术,以及关节囊内额外注射透明质酸或富血小板纤维蛋白的效果。共有96例确诊为骨关节炎(OA)(n = 48)或关节内紊乱(DD)(n = 48)的患者,被分配接受单针关节穿刺术并扩张关节,或传统双针关节穿刺术,每月进行一次关节囊内注射药物(透明质酸(HA)或富血小板血浆(PRP)),持续6个月。比较通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的最大开口度和疼痛程度。每组均表现出显著改善,即疼痛减轻和开口度增加。单针穿刺技术与双针穿刺技术在减轻疼痛方面效果相似,但在最大开口度方面效果显著更好。比较OA和DD队列时,疼痛减轻程度相似;然而,盘状移位患者的开口度明显优于OA患者。关节囊内应用药物在HA和PRP组均导致疼痛显著减轻,就开口度改善而言,富血小板纤维蛋白明显优于HA。