Marini Davide, Rubegni Giovanni, Sarti Lorenzo, Rufa Alessandra, Mandalà Marco, Ferretti Fabio, Tosi Gian Marco, Fruschelli Mario
Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
School of Orthoptic and Ophthalmologic Assistance, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 23;13(24):7847. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247847.
: Ocular proprioception is implicated in balance control and heterophoria is associated with abnormal posture, though previous research focused mainly on the role of vertical phoria and the use of vertical prisms. This study aims to evaluate whether ocular misalignment and prismatic correction of horizontal phoria affect posture. : Sixty-nine ( = 69) young healthy subjects were included and equally divided by horizontal distance phoria: orthophoria ( = 23), esophoria ( = 23) and exophoria ( = 23). A prism of low power (two-diopter) was placed base out on the non-dominant eye, reducing misalignment in esophorics and increasing it in exophorics more than in orthophorics. Dynamic computerized posturography was performed with the sensory organization test protocol (SOT) of the EquiTest NeuroCom version 8 platform both without and with prism, always maintaining subjects unaware of prism use. A mixed model for repeated measures analysis of variance was run to evaluate the main effect of prism and the interaction effect of prism with baseline phoria. : Composite movement strategy score without prism was 88.1 ± 2.8% (ankle-dominant strategy) and slightly increased to 89.0 ± 3.1% with prism insertion ( = 0.004), further shifting toward ankle strategy. Composite equilibrium score without prism was 80.3 ± 6.5% and remained stable with prism insertion (81.3 ± 8.2%, = 0.117), medio-lateral and antero-posterior projection of center of gravity did not displace significantly under prism insertion ( = 0.652 and = 0.270, respectively). At baseline, posturographic parameters were statistically independent of individual phoria, and no significant interaction between prism insertion and individual phoria was documented for any parameters ( > 0.05 for all). Secondary analysis and pairwise comparisons confirmed that the effect of prism was strongly selective on condition SOT 5 (eyes-closed, platform sway-referenced) with improvement of equilibrium (70.4 ± 9.7% with prism vs. 65.7 ± 11.6% without) and more use of ankle strategy (81.6 ± 5.3% with prism vs. 78.2 ± 6.0% without), without any interaction of phoria and ocular dominance, while the other conditions were comparable with and without prism. : A two-diopter prism base out on the non-dominant eye induces the body to use the ankle joint more independently of individual phoria, suggesting a small improvement in postural control, while maintaining oscillations of the center of gravity unaltered. Prism seems to enhance the function of vestibular system selectively. Phoria adjustments with prismatic correction enable intervention in postural behavior. Extraocular muscles could act as proprioceptors influencing postural stability.
眼本体感觉与平衡控制有关,隐斜视与异常姿势相关,尽管先前的研究主要集中在垂直隐斜的作用以及垂直棱镜的使用上。本研究旨在评估水平隐斜的眼位偏斜和棱镜矫正是否会影响姿势。
69名年轻健康受试者被纳入研究,并根据水平距离隐斜情况平均分为三组:正视(n = 23)、内隐斜(n = 23)和外隐斜(n = 23)。在非优势眼上放置低度数(2棱镜度)底向外的棱镜,这使得内隐斜者的眼位偏斜减小,外隐斜者的眼位偏斜增加,且增加幅度大于正视者。使用EquiTest NeuroCom版本8平台的感觉组织测试协议(SOT)进行动态计算机化姿势描记,测试时分别在不使用棱镜和使用棱镜的情况下进行,始终不让受试者知晓是否使用了棱镜。采用重复测量方差分析的混合模型来评估棱镜的主要效应以及棱镜与基线隐斜的交互效应。
不使用棱镜时,复合运动策略得分是88.1±2.8%(以踝关节为主导的策略),插入棱镜后略有增加,达到89.0±3.1%(P = 0.004),进一步向踝关节策略转变。不使用棱镜时,复合平衡得分是80.3±6.5%,插入棱镜后保持稳定(81.3±8.2%,P = 0.117),插入棱镜时重心的中外侧和前后投影没有明显位移(分别为P = 0.652和P = 0.270)。在基线时,姿势描记参数在统计学上与个体隐斜无关,并且对于任何参数,均未记录到插入棱镜与个体隐斜之间的显著交互作用(所有P>0.05)。二次分析和两两比较证实,棱镜的效应在条件SOT 5(闭眼,平台摆动参考)下具有很强的选择性,平衡得到改善(使用棱镜时为70.4±