Banach Monika, Borowicz Kinga K
Independent Experimental Neuropathophysiology Unit, Chair and Department of Toxicology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8b, PL-20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 18;25(24):13563. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413563.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the anticonvulsant efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ) following acute and chronic administration across four treatment protocols in a murine model of maximal electroshock-induced seizures. A single dose of the drug was utilized as a control. The neurotoxic effects were evaluated in the chimney test and the passive avoidance task. Furthermore, plasma and brain concentrations of CBZ were quantified across all treatment protocols. The subchronic administration of CBZ (7 × 2 protocol) resulted in an attenuation of its antielectroshock effect. In the three remaining treatment regimens (7 × 1, 14 × 1, and 14 × 2) the median effective doses of CBZ were comparable to the control. Neither acute nor chronic treatment with CBZ resulted in a discernible impact on motor coordination or long-term memory. The plasma and brain concentrations of CBZ were significantly lower in most chronic protocols when compared to a single-dose application. This may explain the transient attenuation of CBZ effectiveness in the 7 × 2 protocol, but not the return to the previous level. The anticonvulsant and neurotoxic profiles of CBZ did not differ after single and chronic administration. Therefore, experimental chronic studies with CBZ are not prerequisites for concluding and possibly translating results to clinical conditions.
本研究的目的是在最大电休克诱导癫痫发作的小鼠模型中,通过四种治疗方案评估急性和慢性给予卡马西平(CBZ)后的抗惊厥疗效。使用单剂量药物作为对照。在烟囱试验和被动回避任务中评估神经毒性作用。此外,在所有治疗方案中对CBZ的血浆和脑浓度进行定量。CBZ的亚慢性给药(7×2方案)导致其抗电休克作用减弱。在其余三种治疗方案(7×1、14×1和14×2)中,CBZ的半数有效剂量与对照相当。CBZ的急性或慢性治疗均未对运动协调性或长期记忆产生明显影响。与单剂量应用相比,大多数慢性方案中CBZ的血浆和脑浓度显著降低。这可能解释了7×2方案中CBZ有效性的短暂减弱,但无法解释其恢复到先前水平的原因。单剂量和慢性给药后CBZ的抗惊厥和神经毒性特征没有差异。因此,CBZ的实验性慢性研究并非得出结论并可能将结果转化为临床情况的先决条件。