da Silva Utta Ana Cristina, Chiatante Gianpasquale, Schifani Enrico, Meriggi Alberto, Fernandes Itanna Oliveira, Borges Paulo A V, Solar Ricardo R C, Baccaro Fabricio Beggiato, Grasso Donato Antonio
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus CEP 69067-375, Amazonas, Brazil.
Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo dell'Università s/n, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Insects. 2024 Dec 3;15(12):961. doi: 10.3390/insects15120961.
Human-driven changes in land cover and use can significantly impact species ants community structures, often leading to a decline in taxonomic diversity or species homogenization. Ant morphology, used as a proxy for ecological function, offers a valuable framework for understanding the effects of anthropogenic disturbances on ant diversity. This study explored the morphological diversity of ant assemblages in agricultural ecosystems and secondary forests in Italy and the Brazilian Amazon, analyzing how these communities are structured and adapted to different environments. The research aims to understand the ecological interactions and the role of ants in maintaining biodiversity in these contexts. The study was conducted in the Ticino River Natural Park, Italy, and the Paragominas mosaic in Pará, Brazil. The ants were sampled using epigean pitfall traps at 15 agricultural and 13 forest sites. In the secondary forests, the species richness was significantly higher in both countries compared to agricultural areas. In general, the Community Weighted Mean (CWM) of the selected traits (head length, head width, interocular distance, mandible length, eye width, Weber's length, and tibia length) of Brazilian ants was higher than those of Italian. However, the CWM of agricultural areas of the two countries was more similar. We noticed the convex hull (i.e., the volume of an assemblage in the morphological space) of Brazilian secondary forests was still larger than Italian secondary forests when both assemblages have the same number of species. Morphological homogenization was more pronounced in agricultural settings, whereas secondary forests showed more variability, highlighting the role of environmental filtering in shaping ant communities across land use types.
人类驱动的土地覆盖和利用变化会对蚂蚁物种群落结构产生重大影响,常常导致分类多样性下降或物种同质化。蚂蚁形态可作为生态功能的替代指标,为理解人为干扰对蚂蚁多样性的影响提供了一个有价值的框架。本研究探讨了意大利和巴西亚马逊地区农业生态系统及次生林中蚂蚁群落的形态多样性,分析了这些群落的结构以及它们如何适应不同环境。该研究旨在了解这些环境中蚂蚁的生态相互作用及其在维持生物多样性方面的作用。研究在意大利的提契诺河自然公园和巴西帕拉州的帕拉戈米纳斯镶嵌区进行。使用地表陷阱在15个农业地点和13个森林地点采集蚂蚁样本。在次生林中,两国的物种丰富度均显著高于农业区。总体而言,巴西蚂蚁所选性状(头长、头宽、眼间距、上颚长度、眼宽、韦氏长度和胫节长度)的群落加权均值高于意大利蚂蚁。然而,两国农业区的群落加权均值更为相似。我们注意到,当两个群落物种数量相同时,巴西次生林的凸包(即形态空间中一个群落的体积)仍大于意大利次生林。形态同质化在农业环境中更为明显,而次生林表现出更大的变异性,这突出了环境过滤在塑造不同土地利用类型蚂蚁群落中的作用。